Sunday, October 04, 2009
Cervarix - "will not decrease cervical cancer rates"
Pic: Sunday Express
[It is highly unusual for a researcher to publicly criticise a vaccine which they helped get approved.
However, Dr Harper, who has written many of the published medical papers about the jab, is so concerned she decided to speak out.
Dr Harper, of the University of Missouri-Kansas, said she believed the risks – “small but real” – could be worse than the risk of developing cancer itself.
And she claimed: “All this jab will do is prevent girls getting some abnormalities associated with cervical cancer which can be treated. It will not decrease cervical cancer rates at all.
“Parents need to know this and that in a small number of cases there are serious side effects.”]
Full article HERE
Author Christina England digs deeper on the American Chronicle website with a hard-hitting article that is damning to both GSK's Cervarix and Merck's Gardasil. Her research should be applauded and every single parent in the UK should read this before they consent to their child being given the vaccine.
It should be down to the parent to weigh up the benefit/risk factors of these vaccines, sadly without both sides of the argument, they will always have a belief in what the pharmaceutical companies and medicine regulators say.
Christina's article, 'How safe are HPV Vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix? The conflicting evidence which does not add up', can be read HERE
ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
About the Author :
Bob Fiddaman has been writing about the dangers of antidepressants since 2006. In 2011 he was presented with two human rights awards from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights.