GOT A STORY?

Email me

Thursday, March 31, 2011

10 Year Old Boy Hangs Self - High levels of Prozac and Ritalin found in body

Image: 24dash.com


This from the Daily Mail today.

"Post-mortem tests on his body found the level of anti-depressant drugs found in his system were above the normal therapeutic level for adults."

Once again a young life taken. Once again the victim of suicide. Once again the British drug regulator, the MHRA, have failed to safeguard human health.

The inquest into this poor 10 year old boy, who was prescribed Ritalin for "ADHD" and an antidepressant [believed to be Prozac] found that he was being bullied and, as a result, was self-harming.

The Daily Mail writes:

Harry Hucknall was a 'troubled boy' who had suffered at the hands of bullies but he did not commit suicide, an inquest into his death was told.

Post-mortem tests on his body found the level of anti-depressant drugs found in his system were above the normal therapeutic level for adults.

The coroner, Ian Smith said he did not criticise their prescription in Harry's circumstances, nor did he argue that the drugs should not be used by children, but he pointed out that doctors must be 'extremely careful' in prescribing powerful drugs to 10-year-olds.

I guess that's a start, a coroner speaking out against the power of these drugs.

He added, "We as a society quite rightly try to stop children dabbling in street drugs and yet a child with this label of ADHD is prescribed, under supervision, mind-altering drugs of a very powerful nature - the full consequences of which I still do not believe are fully understood.


"It is very difficult to speculate how these two drugs could affect Harry's mental state. It seems very much to me that these drugs and their levels and the measurement of those levels are still a work in progress from the point of medical science."

Well, Mr Smith, do your homework and you will find that there is no medical science to ADHD, furthermore the drug Ritalin is being dished out to kids as young as 4 here in the UK, probably much younger if truth be known.

Quite why this poor child was prescribed both Ritalin and Prozac is a mystery, to me at least. Here we have two very powerful drugs, two drugs that adults find hard to tolerate, two drugs whose history shows a long list of suicidal acts. Benefits outweigh the risks, huh?

If, as coroner, Ian Smith suggests, "...these drugs and their levels and the measurement of those levels are still a work in progress..." then God help the children who are part of that 'work in progress'.

Don't expect the MHRA to intervene...they are too busy back-slapping one another for cracking down on people selling fake Viagra - thus saving their paymasters wads of cash.

Full story HERE




Fid


ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

"We Speak For The Dead...To Protect The Living" - Unless Drugs Are Involved.



It appears the Coroner's Court in Ontario, Canada, are once again poking their noses into matters and rejecting strong evidence that supports prescription medication that can lead to suicide.

As in the Sara Carlin case, some ignorant buffoon type, in the shape of Coroner Dr. Bonita Porter, has ruled that in the case of Moncton teen, Ashley Smith, no video evidence of forced drug injections by staff at Joliette Prison in Quebec can be allowed as evidence in her inquest.

The video's, which were plastered all over youtube last year, show Ashley's final moments.

Ashley Smith, a 19 year old Canadian woman who was incarcerated for the crime of throwing an apple at a postman. She was just 15 years of age when a 30 day sentence was handed down to her. The 30 day sentence spread to 4 years as Smith was transferred on 17 separate occasions by Corrections Canada. The transfers spanned four of the five regions of the Correctional Service of Canada.

Last year I wrote about a report that had surfaced from 2008.

The report includes historical facts excerpted from document archives and video footage provided by five governmental departments as well as relevant information provided by departmental authorities, experts and other stakeholders. It includes a review of the services provided by the Department of Public Safety, the Department of Social Development, the Department of Health, the Department of Education and the Department of Justice. The report outlines 25 recommendations to government. The Ombudsman and Child and Youth Advocate is committed to reviewing and measuring the progress made with regards to these recommendations by the aforementioned departments and to release publicly a progress report in a year’s time.

The full report can be downloaded HERE

Coroner Dr. Bonita Porter ruled the July 2007 videos of prison staff at Joliette forcibly giving the girl needles are not relevant to Smith’s death. She added, "I am not aware of any information … that suggests a nexus between [the forced injections in July 2007] … and the pattern of ligature use which eventually led to her death."

Judge for yourselves then ask yourself why Dr. Bonita Porter feels this way.

The Ontario Coroner's Court motto is, "We Speak For The Dead...To Protect The Living"

Yup, of course you do!




Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

FIDCAST - EPISODE I - AN INTERVIEW WITH LEONIE FENNELL, MOTHER OF SHANE CLANCY


Shane Clancy




FIDCAST - Episode one features an interview with Leonie Fennell, the mother of 22 year old Shane Clancy, who, after only 17 days on the SSRi Cipramil [Celexa], killed a young man and seriously injured two other people before killing himself.

The FIDCAST features music from Arun Bhanot and Ask Alife, both unsigned artists.

I sincerely hope Lundbeck listen to this, I also hope the medicine regulatory authorities listen to it too. To be brutally honest, the regulatory authorities, whether they be in Ireland, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada or the US, should hang their heads in shame for allowing this group of drugs on to the market...and for continuing to allow them to be prescribed to children and adolescents.

Other Cipramil [Celexa] stories from SSRistories.com can be read HERE


APPROX RUNNING TIME 50 Minutes

MP3 DOWNLOAD HERE

LISTEN HERE [AUDIO ONLY]







Leonie's blog can be found HERE

SSRI Withdrawal guidance **Please remember, this is just a guidance.


To contact FIDCAST please EMAIL



Fid



ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Sunday, March 27, 2011

AK 47 RECOMMENDED FOR SLEEP DISORDER.

PROMO VIDEO FOR NTSS




Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, March 26, 2011

ADHD CONCERTA ADVERT



I was browsing through youtube the other day and stumbled upon one of those sickly sugar flavoured pharmaceutical adverts. The ad, for the "ADHD" drug, methylphenidate, brand name Concerta, features a mother speaking about how all of her children have ADHD...and all of them are on Concerta, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Inc wonder pill. The mother proudly boasts that she too has ADHD and is also on Concerta.

The ad carries the disclaimer, "The individuals appearing in this video have been compensated for their participation and are not actors."

The mother, known as 'Natalie' talks through the first segment of the video:

"...if there's a child in the family that has ADHD, there's a chance that one of the parent's will also have ADHD"

She continues:

"I'm an adult that was recently diagnosed with ADHD and I have four children. My oldest son is named Max, he is 14 years old, he has ADHD.


"I have an 11 year old son, whose name is Sam, he also has ADHD.


"I have a 9 year old daughter named Mia, she also has ADHD.


"And I have an 8 year old son named Judah who was just recently also dignosed with ADHD."

Bravo to Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Inc for the vomit inducing advert. Perhaps they should go into detail and describe exactly how ADHD is diagnosed or better still show the scientific proof that ADHD actually exists.

The ad appears on the "ADHD" channel on youtube, a channel that carries the Concerta logo at the top of its page and hosts various videos regarding ADHD and its treatment.

Concerta is basically a sustained release version of Ritalin, a drug manufactured by Novartis.

In the United States, methylphenidate is classified as a Schedule II controlled substance, the designation used for substances that have a recognized medical value but present a high likelihood for abuse because of their addictive potential. It is approved for use in children and adolescents in both the US and UK.

The youtube page has a host of links that direct viewers to the Concerta website where you are greeted with screening tests and offers [vouchers]

To get a 30 Day FREE coupon offer, all you need to do is sign up to the website.

They write:

Sign up today and receive a free coupon in printable PDF format. Ask your healthcare professional about managing the everyday challenges of ADHD symptoms with CONCERTA®. Then, submit coupon at your pharmacy along with your prescription for a free 30-day* supply of CONCERTA®. (Restrictions apply)

I actually couldn't see what the "restrictions" were?

The website adds:

The most common adverse reaction (>5%) reported in children and adolescents was upper abdominal pain.

No mention whatsoever of:

Aggravation, nervousness, hostility, sadness, drug dependence, tics, insomnia and prolonged sleepiness or psychosis, all of which are listed adverse reactions to Concerta.

If you feel brave enough, you can take the online screening test to see if you have ADHD... or let your children try, they have a kiddies version too.

The British drug regulator, the MHRA, report that there has been 991 adverse drug reactions to Concerta and a total of 13 deaths - remember this is the MHRA's yellow card reporting system, a system that is about as transparent as a brick wall.

It's been said that any figures from the MHRA's flawed system should be, at the very least, multiplied by 100.

Here's the video:



FACTS

It has never been proven that ADHD is inheritable, it's just a theory.

The cause of ADHD has not been fully defined.

ADHD symptoms and signs are basically found in every single child, "signs" such as;


  • The child often fails to give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes in schoolwork, work, or other activities.
  • The child often has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play activities.
  • The child often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly.
  • The child often does not follow through on instructions and fails to finish schoolwork, chores, or duties in the workplace.
  • The child often has difficulty organizing tasks and activities.
  • The child often avoids, dislikes, or is reluctant to engage in tasks that require sustained mental effort (such as schoolwork or homework).
  • The child often loses things necessary for tasks or activities (toys, school assignments, pencils, books, or tools).
  • The child is often forgetful in daily activities.

Hand on heart, can anyone out there say that they have not experienced the majority of the above during their childhood years?

Couldn't all of the above be down to tiredness?

Doncha just wish that Concerta or Ritalin were around when we were kids.

PHARMA - Drugging children for forgetfulness and daring to feel tired.

In 2002, The Netherlands Advertisement Code Commission (Reclame Code Commissie) ruled that the country's Brain Foundation cannot claim that the controversial psychiatric condition Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurobiological disease or brain dysfunction. The Commission ordered the Foundation to cease such false claims in their advertising.

The Advertisement Code Commission was responding to a complaint brought by the Dutch chapter of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) [1]

God, if indeed there is such a thing, must be rubbing his hands in anticipation and waiting for those responsible for the ADHD fraud to finally knock on the pearly gates of his Kingdom.


**An updated version of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), a manual where ADHD was borne, is due out soon.

For more on 'informed consent', visit Ablechild.


[1] 'ADHD is not a brain disorder' Dutch Commission finds psychiatric claim false.


Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

FIDCAST DEMO



TESTING, TESTING, ONE, TWO





Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Judge Ponders Possible Dismissal of Case Against Ex-Glaxo Counsel Lauren Stevens

Image: cbsnews.com



The case against ex-Glaxo Counsel, Lauren Stevens, may be dropped according to press reports this past week or so. King and Spalding, Glaxo's team of highly paid lawyers, will breathe a sigh of relief if the Judge rules in Steven's favour.

The indictment accused the Glaxo official, Lauren C. Stevens of Durham, N.C., of lying to the Food and Drug Administration in 2003, by writing letters, as associate general counsel, denying that doctors speaking at company events had promoted Wellbutrin for uses not approved by the agency. Ms. Stevens “made false statements and withheld documents she recognized as incriminating,” including slides the F.D.A. had sought during its investigation, the indictment stated. [Back story]

It would appear she may get off on a technicality - don't you just love the law!

Anyway, these are for you Lauren.





Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

My Thoughts on the Psychopharmacuetical Monopoly



Since I returned from LA I've wrote a lot about other SSRi's and personal stories, in particular the death of 17 year old Toran Henry from New Zealand [Prozac] and the death of Matthew Schultz [2 hours old] [Effexor]

In the past I have wrote about Sara Carlin [Seroxat/Paxil], Sharise Gatchell [Seroxat/Paxil] and have other personal stories lined up, stories of children who have left us and left behind grief stricken families.

What LA taught me was there is a huge problem with SSRi medication. It is effecting all walks of life, adults, children, pregnant mothers.

There is something dark at work here folks, it stretches far beyond the manufacturers of these drugs and embroils psychiatry, medicine regulators, government and coroners.

With such a powerful field of opposition the small man has very little chance of getting his voice heard.

We have the pharmaceutical industry denying that they have done any wrong in not being open and honest about SSRi clinical trials, psychiatrists being paid by the said pharmaceutical companies to 'big up' the drugs, medicine regulators who, quite honestly, are about as useful as a chocolate kettle, government officials that only care about any issues if it benefits them getting votes at the next local elections and coroners who are so distanced from grief that they cannot see the wood through the trees.

All of he above are part of the problem. All of the above are responsible for the grief stricken parents, the thousands, if not millions, of people who struggle on a day-in - day-out basis with withdrawal from these addictive drugs. Their only form of defence is:

1. What else is there?

2. These drugs are safe, those that speak out are Scientologists

3. The benefits outweigh the risks

Do they understand how utterly ridiculous they look when they tout 1,2 and 3?

More and more families are being introduced into the seedy world of the Psychopharmacuetical Monopoly. Their children are being targeted by psychiatrists that invent labels of some new psychiatric disorder that the majority of us passed off as being 'just life' when we were children. Family doctor's are agreeing with them because they need a solution for Mrs Jones son who is being boisterous and rebellious in class or Mr Smith's daughter who, at 15, is having mood swings.

We've got complete buffoonery going on with an Australian psychiatrist who cannot only predict if your child has a 'disorder', he can predict if they will get one in future years! For this absurd fantasy he was voted as 'Australia's Man of the Year!

Cheekily, I added myself to his Facebook page and threw out the following question to him:

"Hey, do you think you could predict this weeks Lotto numbers for me, only I hear you can predict whether or not a child will get some sort of mental illness in future years."

He deleted me from his page...without answering. To be honest, I expected nothing less.

So, to fight back, what do we, as advocates, concerned citizens, have at our disposal?

Well, we have lawyers. Go bust this pharmaceutical company for us and show the public just what they are really like. In Britain, at least, a law firm against a pharmaceutical company is akin to a flea biting an elephant, no more better than the average blogger speaking out against this sick industry. At least we, as bloggers, don't have to bow down to lawyers etiquette. We can pretty much go for the jugular when writing about pharmaceutical companies and regulators and their complete lack of transparency, at least that's what I try to do with my writing.

There are an abundance of human beings suffering at the hands of drugs that were given to them to make them feel better. When they seek help they are told it's not the drugs. When they are vocal, they are attacked from pharmaceutical whores, those in the pocket of the industry, those who clearly have their own agenda's in suppressing the truth.

Coroner's will drag out their reports, leaving a family in limbo, often refusing to carry out the toxicology tests that would show traces of SSRi medication. Once dragged to the limits of a two year wait for such a report, the family are handed the report... time barred from seeking any recourse from the pharmaceutical industry because...well, that's the way the law is.

The limp-wristed cowards that make up the medicines regulators sleep well at night because their sub-committees highlight that there are problems with SSRi's, they forward letters of warnings to doctor's, nurses, psychiatrists who don't even have to open them. Why would they? I can only assume that they think the regulators are basically those who grant licences to drugs, anything else they have to offer is of no importance.

Then along comes a group of noisy revelers, bloggers, campaigners, lobby groups who highlight the dangers of these drugs only to be appeased by the powerless regulators who spend more time targeting natural remedy shops than those they claim to protect from unsafe prescription drugs [the public]

You know, filling an adverse reaction report in and sending it off to a regulator shouldn't just be it. Any reports collected should be thoroughly researched, instead it's just another statistic put into a database that shows that the regulator are doing their job when in reality they are merely sweeping this problem under a very big carpet.

Every single child who commits suicide should have a screening to see if traces of antidepressant medication is found, not a standard screening either, a thorough one. The wizard psychiatrists are quick to screen them when they are alive so why not allow them the dignity of a screening process when they are dead?

I was recently asked if I wanted to attend a meeting with the MHRA to discuss SSRi withdrawal issues. A campaigner had written to the UK Health Minister who, in turn, had passed the letter of concern onto the MHRA. Same old story, pass the buck until the campaigners grow tired. I refused to be part of any such meeting as I have been down that road before. Why sit with a bunch of people who nod their heads when they hear horrific stories of withdrawal, suicide, self-harm then do absolutely nothing to eradicate the problem.

"Oh, we will send a letter out to warn doctor's"

Whoopiefuckingdoo!

They are at a loss of what to do because they are paid for by the pharmaceutical industry, how could they chastise their paymasters?

Our government are scared to speak out because the industry will just move their business elsewhere leaving an already depleted Britain in a further financial mess. Meantime, more and more children will fall into the system of the Psychopharmacuetical Monopoly - Pharmaceutical companies - Psychiatry - Regulators - Coroner's.

1. Pharmaceutical companies - Manufacture a remedy
2. Psychiatry - Create an illness for that remedy
3. Regulators - Grant licence for remedy to treat the illness created by psychiatry
4. Coroner's - Find no apparent connection with treatment - blame it on the created illness.

It's a vicious cycle of greed, manipulation and cowardice, each one finding excuses to blame the person before them.

Psychiatrist - It wasn't my fault I prescribed the drug, it's the manufacturer of said drug.

Regulator - It's not our fault, we sent warning letters out to psychiatrists.

Coroner's - We have been assured by the pharmaceutical industry that these drugs do not cause suicide.

Pharmaceutical companies- These drugs are not meant to be given to children.

In truth, the pharmaceutical companies have a good argument, thing is, they know their drugs are being given to children and they do nothing about it.

As a parent, would you allow  someone to give a cigarette to your 4 year old, or maybe half a bottle of vodka?

Same thing, the pharmaceutical industry know this goes on but it makes them bucket loads of cash, more cash to pay psychiatrists to invent new illnesses...and so the cycle continues.

They can tout the 'these drugs are not meant for children' all they want - It's obviously a lie, why else would GlaxoSmithKline be trialling out Paxil/Seroxat on children as young as 7 in Japan?

Chances are the CEO's are pharmaceutical companies have children and grandchildren, what's the betting that they are never given psychiatric drugs?

Same goes for regulators families, why allow their children, grandchildren to take a class of drugs that they know so much about...but do very little about it.

No doubt the MHRA will swarm over this post - if they don't like it.... let them send me a letter.

I won't open it.


Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Two Hours With Matthew - The Story of "Effexor Baby", Matthew Schultz.







Over the years I have been writing this blog I have come across some truly heart rending stories with regard to the loss of life. I've spoken at length with parents of those who have fallen foul to the greed of pharmaceutical companies, strived to highlight the truth that the mainstream media are too afraid to publish for fear of lawsuits hanging over their heads from manufacturers of antidepressants who wish to keep the truth within the confines of their vaults. Up to now, I've never really dived into the death of newborns, those unfortunate souls who died within months, weeks, days, and in the case of Matthew Schultz, hours.


Matthew was born on February 21, 2009. His parents, Amery and Christiane, spent just two hours with him before he passed away. He weighed just 7 pounds 3 ounces. He went into cardiac arrest shortly after he was born.


Matthew died from Effexor exposure, although at the time his parents didn't know this. Why would they? Effexor carried no warning. Neither Amery or Christiane were warned about the potential dangers of taking Effexor whilst pregnant, they were told many, many times that Effexor was safe.


Matthew's mother had been taking Effexor during her pregnancy, she was prescribed it by her doctor, who had diagnosed that she was suffering with "severe chronic depression", as a matter of fact, Christiane had been taking Effexor for 8 years prior to giving birth to Matthew.


"Christiane was never really truly depressed", recalls husband Amery, "Effexor never really changed her moods at all. However, once Christiane was on Effexor she found it almost impossible to get off." Amery added, ".. they turned her into an emotional zombie. Although she still had depressive symptoms, she never truly had happy moments."


During her 8 years on Effexor, Christiane had given birth to three other children, two of them were born with heart murmers whilst the third was born extremely under-weight at full term and also had a lung disorder. At no point did doctors associate Effexor being the causation of the three children being born with defects.


During her pregnancy with Matthew, Christiane asked the OBGYN, the physician who specializes in medical and surgical care to women with expertise in pregnancy, childbirth, if it was safe to take Effexor whilst pregnant. The reply, recalls Amery, was, "Women take this stuff all the time, we don't see any problem with it."


Christiane recounts on an early blog post of hers that both her and husband, Amery, had done a lot of research since their son had died. She writes:


Since Matthew died, we have done a lot of research. Turns out that my antidepressants have serious side effects. Not only to me, but my children through me. That would explain why out of 5 pregnancies, I have had something wrong with all of them. And why each subsequent pregnancies were more and more difficult.


Furthermore, both Christiane and Amery supplied their doctor with large amounts of evidence regarding Effexor and infant death they had obtained off the internet. Their doctor was astonished.


Too little, too late for Amery and Christiane.


The Canadian drug regulator, Health Canada, have, in the past, issued warnings to doctors regarding taking SSRi/SNRi medication whilst pregnant. This, however, is just not implemented, in fact, doctor's don't even have to read any warnings they get from Health Canada.


On June 28, 2004 some 5 years before Matthew was born, the FDA and Wyeth [Effexor's then manufacturer] issued a new MedWatch drug Alert to healthcare professionals: [1]


"Neonates exposed to Effexor, other SNRIs (Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors), or SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors), late in the third trimester of pregnancy have developed complications requiring prolonged hospitalization, respiratory support, and tube feeding."


This information was sent out to the medical profession in America. Two years later, in 2006, Health Canada issued a warning to all pregnant women considering becoming pregnant that SSRI drugs similar to Effexor may pose life-threatening risks to their babies. Nursing mothers were also warned that SSRIs could be secreted in milk and could have an effect on nursing infants. [2]


So, why, if this information was out there, did Christiane continue taking Effexor?


It's simple really, the public are rarely told by the medical profession about such warnings because the doctor's, nurses, OBGYN's, psychiatrists, rarely read the warnings. Like the UK, there is no system in place to make the medical profession read the warnings. The regulator has a clear conscience because they can profess that they did everything to warn about the dangers.


We know that's bullshit, right?


If the CEO of Health Canada saw his daughter climbing into a rubber dinghy and he knew that rubber dinghy had two holes in it, do you honestly think he would send her a letter of warning?


Of course not, it's absurd.


With millions of dollars spent on the promotion of these drugs, is it too much to ask Health Canada, or any other regulator for that matter, that when a warning as severe as death occurs, they shout it from the rooftops rather than send a letter that may never be opened by the recipient?


It's common sense really...then again, if Health Canada are anything like the British drug regulator, the MHRA, common sense won't be in their dictionary.


Amery and Christiane have been at loggerheads with their coroner regarding Matthew's death. In February, 2011, Amery received the final coroner's report. It was delivered to him on the 21st February, Matthew's 2nd birthday and 2nd anniversary of his death.


Fantastic timing huh?


What is utterly perverse about the coroner's report is that Coroner Robert Saunders, Province of British Columbia, stated that there was no anatomical or toxicological cause of death. Yet under the heading, "Other Significant Conditions Contributing to Death", Exposure to venlafaxine in utero is listed? Furthermore, the coroner adds that this is "Natural" [See pic below]


Click to enlarge




In essence, Saunders is stating that it is natural for anyone to die after being exposed to Effexor in utero.


Amery, obviously, was incensed, who wouldn't be? This prompted him to write a blog entitled, "How far could your head be up your ass?" He opens with the paragraph;


This past week I recieved what is supposed to be the final report from the Coroner on Matthew’s brief life and death. As I allude to in the title of this posting, the presiding coroners have their heads firmly implanted in their collective asses. I have taken the liberty of uploading the three pages of the report here. The irony of this report being issued on Matthew’s second birthday was not lost on us.


One has to question the insensitivity of the coroner here. He can't claim to not know the date of Matthew's death as it is plastered all over the report, so why send it out to parents on what would have been such a sombre date for them?


The Coroners Service of British Columbia is responsible for the investigation of all unnatural, sudden and unexpected, unexplained or unattended deaths. It makes recommendations to improve public safety and prevent death in similar circumstances.[3]


I've said in previous articles I have wrote that coroner's deal with death on a daily basis, seeing a dead body is like eating a bowl of cornflakes, it's such a regular occurrence but for crying out loud, show some tact when sending out reports to grieving parents!


Amery and I have corresponded over the years. I feel for him and I also greatly admire him. Yet again, life has been snatched away from loving parents, a life that was not given a chance because a greedy pharmaceutical company and an inept medicines regulator failed in their duty to give Matthew Schultz a chance of life. It's a despicable act and one that should never be forgotten.


Fid


[1] http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/04/06/29.php
[2] http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/effexor-heart-birth-defects.html
[3] http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/coroners/


Further reading


http://twohours.wordpress.com/


Matthew's Facebook page


**The following video contains images that some viewers may find deeply upsetting. It is with the wishes of both parents that these pictures be shown to highlight the dangers of taking SSRi/SNRi medication whilst pregnant.




ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Sunday, March 20, 2011

New Zealand Prozac Case File - Mother On A Mission - Part IV of IV

Maria Bradshaw, a mother in torment.


Previously:

PART I - New Zealand Prozac Case File - Toran Henry

PART II - New Zealand Prozac Case File - The Loss

PART III - New Zealand Prozac Case File - The Inquest, The Suppression Revealed

Today, 20th March 2011, marks the third anniversary of Toran Henry's death, fitting then that this final post should highlight the efforts of his mother, Maria Bradshaw.

Beaten black and blue by the injustice of a coroner's recommendations, haunted by the failure of the medical profession who "looked after" Toran's welfare and aghast at the behaviour of Toran's school, Maria goes about her business with the same passion and desire she had when she was in full time employment.

A lot has to be said about any human being who can put up with barriers thrown in their direction. Maria has lost her job, her car and her house, the latter two being sold to pay solicitor's fees during the inquest of her son Toran, a staggering $70,000.

Maria has stared adversity in the face and gave it a two fingered salute, she refuses to be beaten, she stands up for what she believes in and smashes the barriers placed in her way as she strives to venture down her path to find justice.

Maria is no stranger to the media, she has appeared on countless radio shows, many TV news bulletins and has featured in many newspaper articles across New Zealand.

In August 2010 Maria, along with Deb Williams, formed the lobby group Community Action on Suicide Prevention, Education & Research, or CASPER for short. The group was formed to offer support to bereaved families and also for the purpose of lobbying for legislative and policy change and challenging the information provided by government funded agency SPINZ. Deb Williams had also lost her child to suicide. Cloudy died of carbon monoxide poisoning, she was just 20.

Co-founder of CASPER, Deb Williams with her daughter, Cloudy.


Both Maria and Deb had been toying with the idea of creating such a group, their minds were made up when, on August 12th 2010, the Chief Coroner was reported as saying that given New Zealand has the most restrictive suicide reporting regime in the world and the hightest rate of youth suicide, it was time to reconsider our approach and talk more openly about suicide. Maria and Deb had been planning to launch CASPER at the end of the year but decided to do it that day.

More recently, CASPER has tried to secure a meeting with New Zealand's Associate Minister of Health and Minister of Suicide Prevention, Peter Dunne. Dunne, whose apparent favour of optimal use of medicines, has so far refused to meet with CASPER. He has, however met with pharmaceutical representatives on seven separate occasions.

Peter Dunne, New Zealand Health Minister



In fact, according to this very public document,  Dunne's initiative to develop a New Zealand medicine's strategy has been given the thumbs up by pharma giants Boehringer Ingelheim.

In a recent interview, Maria told me:

A couple of days before Cloudy's inquest which was before the Chief Coroner, we were invited to file a submission [1] on why we need more open discussion of suicide. We worked for 48 hours without sleep to summarise the international literature on suicide reporting. We argued that secrecy around suicide harms both the community and the families affected and provided the evidence that talking about suicide does not cause copycat suicides or 'suicide contagion' as claimed by our Ministry of Health.

The Coroner read our submission and, in a move unprecedented in NZ, allowed uncensored reporting of Cloudy's inquest, saying in his judgement that he was persuaded that this had more benefits than harm.

In response, Peter Dunne asked the Ministry of Health to advise the government on whether the media reporting guidelines on suicide needed updating and whether the Coroner's Act should be changed from the current situation where it mandates secrecy around suicide to a presumption in favour of open reporting. The Ministry admitted its guidelines were 11 years old and did not reflect current thinking but said open reporting is harmful and the Coroner's Act should not be changed.

Peter Dunne decided to convene a meeting to discuss the issues and we requested that we be invited to represent the views of families who have lost a loved one to suicide. He refused to let us attend and lied to us saying it was for the media only. In fact a range of stakeholders were represented.

Casper is based on a belief, supported by evidence, that NZ's approach to suicide prevention actually increaes rather than decreases suicide. Our country has twice the rate of youth suicide as the US and Australia and five times the rate of the UK. We wrote to the Prime Minister asking for a meeting to discuss the evidence that we need to radically change the way we approach suicide prevention. He advised he was too busy and that we should meet with Dunne.

We want to meet with Dunne to discuss the current issue around media reporting of suicide but also a range of other issues. Our suicide rate is 50% higher than our rate of deaths from road traffic crashes. 10% of the deaths of 10 year olds in NZ are suicides and more young people die from suicide in this country than from all medical causes combined. We think this is a health crisis and one which could be prevented if the government would look at the evidence and stop allowing the agendas of a few individuals who have made careers and large incomes from being the only people allowed to discuss suicide and provide advice to government, to prevail.

It's plain to see that some politicians in New Zealand are no better than some of the scum-sucking dregs of society we have here in the UK. It would appear that Dunne has his tongue firmly down the backside of the pharmaceutical industry and forgets about the people that put him into power, his constituents.

Ironically, Dunne was born on 17 March, 3 days shy of the anniversary of Toran Henry's death.

I hope Maria and Deb can convince Dunne to meet with them to discuss their concerns. Having spent a few days with Maria in Los Angeles earlier this year, I am almost certain that she will not give up on Dunne...or anyone for that matter.

Maria and Deb have taken CASPER on the road, they would like to take their lobbying into schools, alas, the New Zealand government doesn't allow suicide prevention education in schools so CASPER get in front of kids only when their parents bring them along to their presentations. They also call for a change in the legislation regarding giving families more support at inquests, the same support that is offered to criminals.

Last year the New Zealand government changed legislation and took away all financial support for families bereaved by suicide. No funeral grant, no counselling assistance, no income support. For many families, the trauma of finding their children dead renders them unable to work. There are many families who have lost their homes and incomes following a suicide. They cannot afford counselling for their surviving children and have unpaid debts as a result of funeral expenses.

I don't wish to embarrass Maria with this post but she has my utmost respect for what she has achieved in the face of adversity. Wherever she goes, be it Los Angeles, Washington or Connecticut, she teams up with like-minded  mothers, her zest for human life and her thirst for justice is a shining beacon that surrounds her.

I set out to help Maria give her son, Toran, a voice. We connected when we met, as I did with other mothers of children lost to psychiatric drugs. I hope Toran has been heard with these series of four posts.

Maria and Toran...I salute you.

Never has a song title been more apt for a warrior such a Maria Bradshaw. She's not quite ready to make nice...and why should she?



FOR TORAN - RIP



Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Please Sir...May I Have Some Ritalin-style medication?



A shocking report surfaced via the Guardian newspaper today with news that UK children, as young as four, are being given Ritalin type drugs, which has prompted a national review by a leading psychological society.

Prescription rates, based on data given by 459 GP's, were highest for children aged six to 12, doubling to just over eight per 1,000 in the five years up to 2008. Children aged 13 to 17 had the second highest rate at six per 1,000.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [N.I.C.E.] said they were concerned that children under six should not be receiving drugs at all.

The UK, as I have said time and time again on this blog, are now following in the steps of America. There is no 'what if we follow', it's happening now and something needs to be done about it.

The Guardian reported that a five-year-old from the West Midlands was found to be receiving a double dose of Ritalin, the drug used to treat "ADHD", despite his school insisting that he is "among the best-behaved children in his class".

The Guardian continues with:

In notes seen by the leading educational psychologist in the case, the boy's headteacher reports that the school does not believe he has ADHD, but that the medication is being prescribed "to help mum at home".

In another case in the West Midlands a five-year-old was put on the drugs for three years at the request of his parents without any consultation with teachers or psychologists.

What sort of society have we become when we allow a dangerous drug to become our children's babysitter - that's the reality of it all. Parents have the quick fix at hand, they are practically giving their children a plastic bag to play with, a box of matches...all those things we were warned about when we were children. "Keep away from the edge of the platform", "Don' t talk to strangers", "Look both ways when you cross the road"

Sound advice. But what we are forgetting, or maybe ignoring, is these types of drugs are just as dangerous as suffocating with a plastic bag, burning yourself with a box of matches, a busy road, a stranger or standing on the edge of a platform. The difference being, parents are told that they are safe, they are effective. The men in white coats tell them little Johnny will be right as rain after a few weeks on the pills or that little Julie needs to increase her dosage due to the fact that she is becoming violent.

Parents fall for it. With the white coated men comes a sense of belief, of trust, a God-like figure who has been through med school so he/she knows exactly what they are talking about.

Ironically, I met with two volunteers from CCHR yesterday in my hometown of Birmingham. I shared a coffee with Sarah and Vicky and we spoke at length about kids in Birmingham being drugged. We brainstormed about ways to put a stop to this. It would appear that parents have to go back to school to get educated, don't expect any help from the UK medicines watchdog, the MHRA, they are all too busy taking the money from the pharmaceutical companies and pussy-footing around with statistics that are clearly wrong. In any event, they are powerless to do anything about this problem. They can issue warning letters to GP's throughout the UK but GP's are not forced to act upon them. Beggars the question why the MHRA have the audacity to use the tagline, "Safeguarding human health" - they are obviously not, particularly where our children are concerned.

Of course the pro-pill pushers [Psychiatry] deny they are doing anything wrong. This from the Guardian:

But Dinah Jayson, consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist at Trafford general hospital and a spokesperson for the Royal College of Psychiatrists, insisted that in some cases it could be "cruel" not to treat children of any age if all other options had been exhausted.

She said: "With every child there is a risk of doing something but there is also a risk of doing nothing. We know early [medical] intervention can help children who would otherwise be losing out."

Jayson, who earlier this year was quoted in another UK newspaper, is a firm believer that ADHD is a developmental condition characterised by inattention and difficulty concentrating, along with hyperactivity and impulsivity. She also told the Daily Mirror:

Those with it are at much higher risk of getting into trouble at school and falling into crime, substance abuse, and broken relationships, if untreated.

So where did this ADHD suddenly appear from? Why wasn't it recognised when I was still at school?

Remember when you were at school? There was always one kid who played up a lot, normally they would be less intelligent than the rest of the class, hence the disruption. I'm no psychologist but it's quite easy to fathom out why a kid is disruptive. It's borne out of frustration, in essence it's a child screaming from within, "TEACH ME, TEACH ME." Either that or the kid is just totally bored by the teacher quoting the Pythagoras theory or the difference between stalactites and stalagmites.

You want to change how children behave? Make education more interesting, don't give them a drug that will turn them into a dribbling suicidal wreck.

I cannot for the life of me understand why people put their faith in the headshrinkers, they are a breed who prescribe these drugs without any knowledge of how these drugs work. They'll tout the chemical imbalance theory to unsuspecting parents, sadly, the parents will believe them. Doctor's or psychiatrist's don't lie, do they?

Outside of school, the children go home to the latest computer console system or sit in front of a monitor leaving messages to friends on their Facebook walls, the same friends who probably live within walking distance of their keyboard. But that's okay, it leaves mom and dad to get on with what needs to be done around the house.

As a youngster I was never in, I chose to play out, running, playing football, Postman's knock [a kissing game with local girls] I'd even knock the door and run, it was all good fun back then, it was fresh air and exercise. These days a kid will go into school and tell his friends about the wonder goal he scored... on his PS2...or is it 3? I just can't keep up with technology these days.

Of course, I generalise. Not all parents are like this, neither are their children but it's only a matter of time before Mrs Jones tells Mrs Smith at the school gates that her son has calmed down so much since he was put on this wonder pill prescribed to him by the family doctor. "Oh, the change is fantastic, he no longer wants attention, he just goes to his room and plays quietly, there are the odd times when he still has an outburst but we just give him his pills and everything is back to normal again." [normal]

I only hope Mrs Smith doesn't have to tell Mr Jones some years down the line that her son killed himself.

The evidence is out there in abundance. Far too many children have died by suicide whilst on these types of medication, far too many have self-harmed, far too many have committed crimes.

Don't let your child become one of the above. Ask you doctor about the drug he is prescribing your child. Write his answers down if you have to. Then go home and do your homework and research the brand name of the drug. If it's Ritalin [which seems to be the psychiatrist's choice of weapon these days] Google 'Ritalin forum' - you should be educated enough to know which ones are pharma funded and which ones are patient run.

Still unsure?

Watch the powerful documentary, 'Dead Wrong: How Psychiatric Drugs Can Kill Your Child' and don't be fooled into thinking that it won't happen to your child.

The Guardian article can be read HERE

You can watch 'Dead Wrong: How Psychiatric Drugs Can Kill Your Child' HERE

Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

COMING SOON - FIDCAST




Coming soon to this blog will be a series of podcasts with advocates, bloggers, patients, parents and other like-minded individuals.

If you have something to say and you wish to get it off your chest by way of a podcast, then feel free to email me at fiddaman64@blueyonder.co.uk

It will be different from your run of the mill podcasts, offering a slot to unsigned artists and advertising/sponsorship for businesses.

For an opportunity to advertise/sponsor, I will be offering 15-30 second slots during each of the podcasts. It would be preferable if you have your own company jingle in mp3 format. For more information please contact me.


More information over the coming weeks.

Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Friday, March 18, 2011

SHOUT OUT TO' AGENT OF CHANGE', JANIS HOUGH



I met Janis Hough online via Twitter, she'd made a comment about Seroxat. Formalities were exchanged, she met with the obligatory interruption from my Irish simpleton stalker, he targets those I make friends with too, when he's not slagging off Scientology or using dead children to goad me in to a response.

Anyway, enough about Glaxo's number one whore.

Janis has a cracking post up on her blog regarding Seroxat. The post, entitled, "Living without Seroxat and other Antidepressants", highlights Janis' work with a patient who has an addiction to Seroxat. She speaks of a client who has reduced from 30mg of Seroxat down to 1mg and is having panic attacks and anxiety.

Janis writes:

As a therapist and coach I see many clients who want to become free of the very drug that was supposed to help them feel better yet paradoxically they feel worse. So fuelled by seeing the latest client I wanted to add my experience in order to help others feel better.

So first off they are not a magic pill, there is no magic pill. They don’t fix the problem.
Latest research says that taking seroxat can lead you to feel suicidal, so which would be better to feel ‘depressed’ or ‘suicidal’, well neither, however if I was prescribed something to help I really would be depressed that it made me feel worse.

I sincerely hope she can help her client, whom I also know.

The full post can be viewed here

Fid
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Pfizer's Stranglehold on the Canadian Market

Image: nydailynews.com


Pharmaceutical giants, Pfizer, have been putting it about lately. Not content with teaming up with the UK medicines regulator [The MHRA] they have now branched further afield and teamed up with the Canadian Medical Association.

Pfizer, whose rap sheet is almost as big as GlaxoSmithKline's, have been causing me concern over the past year or so. With no advertising allowed for prescription drugs here in the UK they, it would appear, are advertising on TV and radio...by proxy.

Back in January 2009 I reported how the British drug regulator, the MHRA, had teamed up with Pfizer in a massive public relations exercise with regard to fake prescription drugs being purchased over the internet. The MHRA teamed up with Pfizer to launch a series of advertisements throughout British cinemas, later they would get the message out on TV advertising slots.

The advertisement campaign was hard-hitting and, I believe, designed to stop people buying cheaper drugs on the internet. All above board... or so we were led to believe.

The advert depicted a male opening a parcel and highlighted just how dangerous it could be when buying drugs over the internet. Here's the 30 second ad.

video

You'll note that viewers are directed to a website at the end of the ad. The website is brought to you by Pfizer. Visitors to the site are greeted with a dark image of a body lying on a coroner's table.

Pfizer have now teamed up with The Canadian Medical Association [CMA] and, according to an article that has appeared in The Globe and Mail, are facing huge criticism.

The CMA have apparently sought the expertise of Pfizer to create an education program for physicians across the country. The Globe and Mail writes:

Some members of the medical community say the CMA is heading down a dangerous road and warn that partnering with Pfizer Canada Inc. may cross a serious ethical line that could negatively influence doctors' treatment decisions.

No shit Sherlock!

Pfizer, who manufacturer the controversial antidepressant Zoloft, appear to be slipping through the back door to promote their wares. If they ain;'t teaming up with a limp-wristed medicines regulator, they are worming their way into doctors surgeries throughout Canada. One can only guess at the incentives they will be giving doctors to promote and prescribe their products.

Pfizer also manufacture other drugs that have received less than favourable consumer approval over the years, drugs such as Chantix, Effexor [due to merger with Wyeth in 2009], Neurontin, Viagra, Xanax and Zoloft.

Pfizer pleaded guilty in 2009 to the largest health care fraud in U.S. history and received the largest criminal penalty [$1.19 billion] ever levied for illegal marketing of four of its drugs. One of Pfizer’s drugs they had been pushing doctors to prescribe was the epilepsy drug Neurontin for uses the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] had never approved.

Should alarm bells be ringing in Canada? I think so. With a company who has pleaded guilty to the illegal promotion of marketing a number of drugs for unapproved uses, it would appear that Canada, or in particular the Canadian Medical Association, are giving Pfizer Carte blanche to, once again, be the puppet masters of the medical profession.

I'd bet a week spent in the company of Shania Twain and a box of Viagra [not that I'd need them] that Pfizer are also entering the medical system of other countries too, we just don't know it...yet.

Or maybe I'm just an old cynic.

Fid

Coming soon

The evidence, however, is clear...the Seroxat Scandal - The paperback
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, March 17, 2011

LOONEY TUNES - THE LOST EPISODE - JOSEPH BIEDERMAN IN 'THE GOD DELUSION'



LOONEY TUNES

THE LOST EPISODE

JOSEPH BIEDERMAN IN 'THE GOD DELUSION'

video


Back story on Biederman HERE


Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

ANTIDEPRESSANT SUICIDE VIDEO

SSRISTORIES.COM has a collection of 4,400+ news stories with the full media article available, mainly criminal in nature, that have appeared in the media (newspapers, TV, scientific journals) or that were part of FDA testimony in either 1991, 2004 or 2006, in which antidepressants are mentioned.

SSRi Stories is a great resource, here's just a small number of SSRi related suicides I have highlighted in this video.

http://ssristories.com/



ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Long-term Effects of Psychiatric Medications - Robert Whitaker

In Anatomy of An Epidemic, Robert Whitaker, acclaimed medical author and journalist, asks "Why has the number psychiatric diagnoses given to adults and children skyrocketed over the past 50 years? Why does this epidemic parallel so closely the growth and dominance of psychiatric drugs as treatment?". The acclaimed US medical journalist documents a history of science and medicine that raises a heretical question: Could this drug-based approach actually be fuelling this modern-day plague? Whitaker argues we need to start an open conversation about how to stem the epidemic of disabling mental distress in society and move to an approach that helps people get well and stay well over the long term.

Robert's lecture begins around the 19.30 mark.



Fid

Thanks to the Truthman for sending me the link.

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Psychiatry - Pre-DSM Meeting

**Contains adult language.



Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 14, 2011

TORAN HENRY - DEATH BY PROZAC VIDEO



Read Toran's story:

PART I

PART II

PART III

Part IV Coming Soon.


Toran Henry was tragically taken from us on the 20th March 2008. Yet another young life destroyed by an antidepressant known to cause suicide in children and adolescents.

His mother is the co-founder of CASPER.

CASPER was established by two mothers whose children died by suicide. The group believes that the knowledge and experience of families bereaved by suicide is as valid and important in understanding and preventing suicide as clinical trial data and epidemiological studies.

http://www.casper.org.nz/home


Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Sunday, March 13, 2011

DSM - From Boneheads to Boners!

"Honey, you need a psych pill."


The Mail Online reported last week that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM] are to list "sex addiction" as a mental disorder, strangely the article is accompanied by a photo of US golfer, Tiger Woods. Oh yeh, he had an extra-marital affair, therefore he must have a sex addiction.

This is just another example of psychiatry wanting to target normality.

Sex is one of the most natural things known to humans...animals too, without it we wouldn't be here.

On a personal front, I haven't played hide the salami for a while now but it doesn't stop me thinking about it, that, in itself, must be a mental disorder going by what the DSM will more than likely print in their comic later this year.

Never one to miss out on inventing an illness, the boneheads who compile the DSM must have latched on to Tiger Woods and his treatment last year. Woods booked himself into a clinic. He basically got busted by his wife for hiding the pickle with another  woman. With no excuses he came up with the "But honey, I have an addiction" excuse. Oh puhleeeeaaaase. You got caught with your pants down, take it like a man and stop making dumb ass excuses.

I just wonder how doctors/psychiatrists are going to diagnose this new 'illness', maybe they will use a word association game with their patient?

Doctor: Ok Mr Jones, I'll show you an object or two, you have to tell me what they remind you of.

Patient: Ok doc.

**Doctor holds up a pair of melons.

Patient: Oh tits doc, big juicy tits.

**Doctor then holds up a pair of grapefruits.

Patient: Oh big juicy tits doc!

**Finally, the doctor holds up a pair of car windscreen wipers.

Patient: Oh huge juicy tits doc!

Doctor: Really?

Patient: Yes, really, huge wobbly tits doc.

"Hold on a minute," said the doctor, "melons and grapefruits may remind you of breasts. But windshield wipers?"

"Yeah!" replied the man, moving his head from left to right making kissing noises, "First this one then that one then this...!"

The patient was last seen leaving the doctor's surgery with a prescription for a psychiatric drug.

I envisage a future where contraceptives [rubbers] and vibrators [dildos] are sold with the standard psychiatric medication.


DSM, I'll shit em.

This goes out to all the boneheads who compile the DSM.

**AC/DC were last seen running down the street away from men in white coats.



Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, March 12, 2011

New Zealand Prozac Case File - The Inquest, The Suppression Revealed - Part III of IV


A classic sign of psychiatry gone mad would be the deposition of one Dr. Joseph Biederman. Biederman, who has links to the promotion of psychiatric medication, was once asked the following:

What rank did you hold at Harvard. “Full professor,” he answered.

“What’s after that?” asked a lawyer.

“God,” Dr. Biederman responded.

“Did you say God?” the lawyer asked.

“Yeah,” Dr. Biederman said.



Previously:

New Zealand Prozac Case File - Toran Henry

New Zealand Prozac Case File - The Loss - Part II of IV

I met Maria Bradshaw a few weeks ago, she approached me and introduced herself. "Hi Bobby, I'm Maria Bradshaw, I've been meaning to talk with you for sometime now...about my son, Toran."

One thing Maria said to me will stay with me forever more. She told me that she had read the Sara Carlin articles I wrote regarding her inquest. She said, "I've read all the articles you wrote about Sara Carlin, you gave her a voice, I wished, at the time, that someone would do the same for me and Toran"

So here I am, writing about another teenager who just happened to take an SSRi...who just happened to kill themselves by hanging...whose inquest was designed to protect the product and to paint a bad picture of the victim.

Coincidence? I think not.

Inquests regarding antidepressant medication and suicide are played down. Let's not alarm the public now as these medicines are life-savers for many millions of people. Fucking bullshit. They are no more effective than a placebo, they are chemical restraints, they are bullets waiting to be loaded, they are promoted fraudulently...they are death in a box.

The cries of the pro-antidepressant brigade will argue, "but they helped me, they still are, without them I would still be depressed" Yeh, they helped you, they stripped away human emotion, they flooded your brain with chemicals. They helped you over a period of time that you found hard to deal with. How long were you on them, a year, two, three, four...maybe you are still on them? Yeh, they did the trick alright. So good that people have been on them for years, a pill promoted to lift your blues yet why do people take them for years on end? Why do people swear that these pills help them get through their daily lives, can't they grasp that their forefathers would have had the same emotional ride - they didn't take meds, they rode the storm. They gave you life.

The psychiatric industry is based on theory. Would you have a leg removed if it was theorized you would be given an extra sensory perception?

Take a look through the history of psychiatry - they have tried so many times to "cure" mental illness, they've never been able to - and yet here we are in the 21st century. We are no further down the road. Psychiatrists hand out these drugs to children and teenagers, step back in time and you will witness how they would release mental illness by drilling holes in the heads of those who were unfortunate enough to be deemed mentally ill. Today they don't use the methods they used all those years ago, instead they gift-wrap their inhumane devices and call them antidepressants or they add the word 'therapy' to make it sound like they really care. One word to put in front of therapy - Electroconvulsive - yeh, that's therapy alright.

There's a public outcry when a doctor or psychiatrist are found guilty of raping a patient. I've news for you, they've been doing it for years with psychiatric drugs...only a small handful now oppose drugging children with these chemical coshes. Those psychiatrists that do speak out are labelled mavericks, Scientologists, a little bit 'off the wall' and/or opinionated meddlers. They are ridiculed by their fellow professionals, the pharmaceutical industry and delusional advocates who side with the industry.

As for inquests, I pretty much lived through the Sara Carlin one, obviously not as much as her family, nonetheless I lived through it, shared tears with Neil Carlin, Sara's father, at the outcome.

Inquests are, it appears, designed not to give the dead a voice, instead it's a tool used to smear the dead, to look for negatives rather than positives. Like psychiatrists, Coroner's have lost emotion, I guess they have been dealing with death for too long that it's just like eating a bowl of cornflakes to them. Inquests are mere warnings to families of the bereaved. 'Oppose us and we will drag your dead child through so much dirt that you will be wishing you could join them.'

Toran Henry had years ahead of him. Maria Bradshaw and I should never have met. The pharmaceutical industry, the limp-wristed medicine regulators, lily-livered coroners, psychiatry and greed are the reasons we did.

I want to give Toran Henry a voice. He wishes to speak so he can protect the living.

This is for those who threw mud in his direction during the inquest, it's for those who bullied a defenseless, mourning mother. It's for future families in New Zealand who, without fear, wish to seek answers as to why their loved ones died.

This is Toran's Court.


The Inquest, The Suppression Revealed - Part III of IV

Central to the inquest was the appropriateness and effect of the prescription of Prozac to Toran Henry, contrary to warnings by its manufacturer that it had a propensity to cause suicide in children and adolescents.  Toran and his family had a right to know that the makers of Fluox [1] specifically warned that it should not be used for those under 18.



Coroner, Dr Murray Jamieson

On the 9 November 2009 the inquest of Toran Henry began, it was to last 20 days.

The Coroner, Dr Murray Jamieson, presided over events.


The Lecture of Counsel, John Moody

About a month before Toran's inquest started, the Coroner appointed John Moody as counsel to assist the court. Moody asked for a meeting with Maria Bradshaw [Toran's mother] and her lawyer.

He started the meeting by lecturing Maria Bradshaw about how wrong it is for parents to take action against those involved in the deaths of their children - that this just delayed healing and recovery and served no purpose. He then said that Coroner Jamieson was totally against the notion of doctors being subject to judicial reviews of their practice.

This, it would appear, is standard for the bereaved family attending or wishing to pursue an inquest, a kind of warning, if you like. Who is John Moody to suggest that any parent wishing to know how or why their child committed suicide is wrong? Furthermore, how can he suggest that an inquest delays 'healing and recovery' and worse still, serves no purpose?

When Maria left the meeting she told her lawyer that she was very concerned at the statements made by Moody. She queried how Jamieson could preside over an investigation into the role of Toran's doctors in his death when he held the views expressed by Moody.

Maria's lawyer said that if she raised the issue, Jamieson would more than likely excuse himself from the case and Maria would end up with the Chief Coroner who, in her lawyer's view, would be even worse to deal with.

Some choice, huh?

Given all of this, Maria was not surprised that the Coroner allowed aggressive questioning of her on the grounds that Maria had threatened manslaughter charges against Zoran Simovik, the unqualified psychiatrist who had prescribed her son Prozac.


Coroner - "'Very uncommon' for SSRIs to be linked with suicide"

Jamieson, who has had no training with regard to SSRi treatment, amazingly voiced his opinion halfway through Toran's inquest. He claimed that in his 8 years as a coroner he knew that it was 'very uncommon' for SSRIs to be linked with suicide and he had great sympathy for 'the psychiatric registrar' ie Zoran Simovik.

Well, first off, let's pick up on his "'very uncommon' for SSRIs to be linked with suicide" statement.

In the USA ALL SSRi's, including Prozac, have been slapped with a black box warning. It warns of suicide in children taking this particular group of medications. Did Jamieson know this? Obviously not, or else he wouldn't have made such a brash declaration. Drug packets in New Zealand do not carry a “Black Box” warning as required by the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] in the United States. [3] As a matter of fact, no patient information leaflets were ever included in any of the Prozac medication that Toran ingested.

Prozac Patient Information Leaflet produced by Eli Lilly and Company

There seems to be a pattern here with what happened in the inquest of Oakville, Canada teen, Sara Carlin. Sara had been taking Paxil when she hanged herself in the basement of her parents home. At day one of her inquest, Coroner's counsel, Michael Blaine, went in front of TV camera's during a short recess in the inquest proceedings. He announced, "The courts acknowledge that this medication can increase thoughts of suicide in particular patients but they don't think that the medication played a role in Sara Carlin's death."

This after half a day of the two week inquest. Similarly, in Toran's inquest, it was the presiding coroner, Dr Murray Jamieson, who sprung to the defence of SSRi's, this approximately a week and a half into the three week inquest.

There's me thinking that all evidence should be heard before any party offers their verdict.

Jamieson was a former gynaecological registrar who resigned from medicine and did a law degree, then became a Coroner. During his time as a gynaecological registrar, Jamieson taught undergraduates about the detection and treatment of cervical cancer and precancerous conditions of the genital tract, he took this teaching position over from Professor Herb Green in 1982. Green, later went on to be embroiled in the Cartwright Inquiry, a Commission of Inquiry held in New Zealand from 1987 - 1988. It was commissioned by the then Minister of Health, Michael Bassett, to investigate the alleged malpractice of Green who had been intentionally undertreating women with cervical cancer and experimenting on his patients without their consent or proper approval.

During the Inquiry, a letter published by the New Zealand Medical Journal surfaced. It was authored by Dr Murray Jamieson.

Jaimeson, speaking of cervical cancer, starts off with a rant about Apostles, Herod Agrippa and the Roamn dictaror, Sulla.

In his letter, Jaimeson, refers to women as "promiscuous"

"Our young people are becoming more permissive and promiscuous. An epidemic of cervical cancer, especially among our younger women, follows inexorably from these premises. True, the victims are not eaten of worms, but gnawed away by cancer (or fear of it)...the wages of sex is a positive smear."

Exactly what was Jamieson implying here, that young women are sluts?

The Cartwright Inquiry 1988 can be downloaded HERE.



Coroner's Court Experts

Dr Sabina Dosani, Kaye Brightly, Dr Sally Merry, Hugh Clarkson, and Murray Patton all gave evidence at the inquest.

Dr Sabina Dosani, medical director and founder of The Leapfrog Clinic


Dosani was born in the UK and trained at the Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital in London. She specialises in Psychiatry and sub-specialised in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

Dr Sabina Dosani was the medical director and founder of The Leapfrog Clinic, a private mental health service for adolescents and children. The blurb from their website [now removed] reads:

The Leapfrog Clinic is passionate about providing high quality treatment for children and their families. We work with children and young adults where there are concerns about their behavioural, mental or emotional wellbeing.

One in five New Zealanders under the age of 21 will experience mental illness.

Leapfrog is unique in its integrated offering of psychiatric, medical and psychological expertise, supported by allied health professionals.

Working with children in their infancy right up until their 21st birthday, Leapfrog strives to help each patient achieve his or her utmost potential. We achieve this with the best clinicians in the country who are at the top of their fields. Drawing on a wealth of therapeutic interventions, all with a robust evidence base we can deliver creative yet scientifically proven treatments.

Their webpage also offered Specialist Assessments for children. A Psychiatric Assessment at $390 plus tax whilst both an Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and a Cognitive assessment would set you back $1000 each...plus tax.



Working with Schools

The Leapfrog Clinic often worked with schools whereby they ran a "Healthy minds workshop" to help staff and young people gain better understanding of mental health and illness. Publications were also offered to staff and pupils regarding; depression, bullying and attention deficit disorder [ADD]

The website also offered two questionnaires. Developmental History Questionnaire and a
Strength & Difficulties Questionnaire. Let's take a look at some of the questions aimed at 4-10 year olds, the optional answers are - 'Not true, 'Somewhat true', and 'Certainly true'

Considerate of other people's feelings?

Restless, overactive, cannot stay still for long?

Often loses temper?

Rather solitary, prefers to play alone?

Constantly fidgeting or squirming?

Easily distracted, concentration wanders?


They read like a commercial for a pharmacuetical drug, eh?

Remember, these sort of questions were aimed at 4-10 year old children!

You can download the questionnaire HERE.

The questionnaire for 11-17 year olds [self-assessment] is pretty much in the same vain, once again the questions sounding like the intro to a pharmaceutical ad for an antidepressant. You can download it HERE.

The Leapfrog Clinic website has been removed, however, the "business" is still running according to the New Zealand's companies register. The Leapfrog website was removed but with a little tweak here and there, I managed to access it HERE

In giving evidence at Toran's inquest, Dosani told the court that it was an accepted practice to prescribe Fluoxetine to adolescents in situations where they have been diagnosed with a major depressive disorder. She agreed that combining Cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] with Fluoxetine is likely to be only marginally more effective than Fluoxetine alone.

Dosani was then questioned by Ms Marshall of the Waitemata District Health Board about the supporting evidence Prof. David Healy, professor in Psychological Medicine at Cardiff University School of Medicine, Wales, had provided.

MS MARSHALL:...Now in your brief you have referred to the fact, and this is at page 12 of your brief, that “the studies differ on whether SSRIs increase suicidal events”?

DR DOSANI: That is correct, yes.

MS MARSHALL: Professor Healy has concluded that “There is a compelling case that Prozac can trigger suicide in susceptible individuals.” Would you agree with that statement?

DR DOSANI: I would not agree that there is a compelling case.

MS MARSHALL: This next statement is “there is little evidence that it is likely to be of benefit in patients in Toran’s age bracket” would you agree with that?

DR DOSANI: No, I disagree with that.

MS MARSHALL: Finally he says “Even less evidence that it is likely to be of benefit to males”. Would you agree with that statement?

DR DOSANI: No, and furthermore that is not something that I had seen before reading this letter.

Evidence given later by Dosani saw her being asked by Ms Janes, acting for Kaye Brightly;

MS JANES: Dr Simovik agreed that he was competent to have a discussion about medication and to make a decision about prescribing Fluoxetine without needing to have prior consulted approval. Would that accord with your experience in child and adolescent?

DR DOSANI: That would be entirely what would be expected of someone of his stage of training.

In Dosani's book, "Defeat Depression", Publisher: Infinite Ideas, one of many she has authored, she suggests that to manage self harm young people should put strawberry ice-cream topping on their wrists to mimic the satisfaction they get from seeing blood. She says if people are depressed they should take their neighbours dog for a walk and if their neighbour's dog has died they should ask their neighbour to go to bingo with them.

This coming from an "expert" witness who disagrees with the world's leading expert in SSRi withdrawal [David Healy]. This coming from a professional psychiatrist who spends time with children in New Zealand and whose Leapfrog clinic targets schools.


Dr. Sally Merry

Dr Sally Merry is a senior lecturer in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. She has worked in clinical psychiatry for over 15 years and has a special interest in anxiety disorders, teenage depression and early intervention.

Anxiety disorders, teenage depression, early intervention? You seeing a pattern here?

This is exactly what Toran Henry was up against. He, through his brave mother, was up against a league of psychiatrists who think it is perfectly normal to medicate young children and adolescents with drugs that are, in essence, stopping children from being children.

Because psychiatrists have no scientific argument they...or rather their attorneys try a different tactic.

Here's some of the defence they used against a grieving mother:


Marinoto lawyers tried to say Toran was obviously a bad child because he had been called into the principals office in relation to bullying when he was 15. In fact he was the victim of bullying not the perpetrator.

The police interviewed 14 of Toran's friends. Twelve said he and his mother had a warm loving relationship while two mentioned an argument they had a week before he died. The Coroner called only those two to give evidence. They recanted their evidence on the stand but he still used it in his decision.

When Toran's mother, Maria, said she was going to call two of his closest friends to give evidence, Takapuna Grammar, Toran's school, released the school disciplinary records of one of them - detailing every detention he had ever had and records of whether his family had paid their school fees. Because of this, Maria immediately decided she wasn't prepared to have the children bullied and intimidated in this way and withdrew them from the witness list.

Maria complained to the Coroner about this breach of the Privacy Act and witness intimidation.

He did nothing about it.

In defending their own records and those of Toran's GP that on fluoxetine Toran slept up to 18 hours a day and that this was a clear side effect of the medication, Kaye Brightley's lawyer tried to run the argument that he slept so much because his mother starved him! This was disproved.

Can you imagine sitting in a coroner's court awaiting the outcome of why your child committed suicide, only to have psychiatrists and their attorneys make suggestions that you were a bad parent?

As I said in my opening ramble in this post. Inquests involving antidepressant medication are designed to destroy the victim and the family of the victim. It's a clear warning that future parents will endure the same if they dare question the drugs their family doctor/psychiatrist dish out.

The purpose of Toran Henry's inquest are self-explanatory:

a the person has died; and
b the person's identity; and
c when and where the person died; and
d the causes of death; and
e the circumstances of death

The second purpose is to make specified recommendations or comments that, in the coroner's opinion, may, if drawn to public attention, reduce the chance of occurrence of other deaths in circumstances similar to those in which the death occurred.

The third purpose is to determine whether the public interest would be served by the death being investigated by other investigating authorities in the performance of exercise of their functions, powers, or duties, and to refer the death to them if satisfied that the public interest would be served by their investigation it in the performance or exercise of their functions, powers, or duties.

The coroner made just one recommendation:

He recommended that Marinoto [Health centre that Toran was under the "guidance" of] review the information provided about fluoxetine [Prozac] to adolescents, particularly the advice about the importance of taking the medication as prescribed.

And that's basically it.

Twenty days of sitting through this horrific ordeal, having psychiatrists give opinions about Toran's state of mind, being labelled a bad mother, having her son painted as some sort of out of control alcoholic juvenile delinquent! This is all the coroner could come up with?

It's practically giving psychiatrists Carte blanche to continue handing out SSRi's...as long as they read the information about it first. Information provided by the pharmaceutical companies whom, under some fucked up law, do not have to release the negative data carried out in clinical trials.

What the coroner failed to pick up on was the following:

Clarkson, who was the most experienced psychiatrist who gave expert testimony, said that with the risk profile emerging with SSRIs it was likely that the drugs would cease to be used in the future.

Dosani said Simovik's practice was way below that which she would expect from a fourth year registrar and that she had concerns about his competence.

The Cllinical Director of Marinoto, Murray Patton, admitted that at no time did Toran ever recieve a full assessment from any of the medical professionals involved in his care.

Toran's school and the police (relying on interviews from his friends) said it was quite clear that Toran was a competely different person when taking fluoxetine and that he reverted to his orignal self when he came off it.

Simovik said he had studied the links between SSRIs and suicide and had no doubt they were causally linked.

Toran's case worker said there was no doubt Toran suffered side effects from fluoxetine.

The head of the New Zealand Medicines Regulator said that SSRIs are not approved for those under 18 in New Zealand as their risks outweighed any benefit. He also said that psychiatrists were abusing the Medicines Act in prescribing these drugs to children. He said his agency had been lobbying government for years to get the power to require black box warnings on SSRIs and to close the loophole in the Medicines Act that allowed their prescription to children but had been ignored.

I refer you two the second purpose of Toran's inquest:

...to make specified recommendations or comments that, in the coroner's opinion, may, if drawn to public attention, reduce the chance of occurrence of other deaths in circumstances similar to those in which the death occurred.

It is my opinion that the coroner, Dr Murray Jamieson, failed miserably in reducing the chance of occurrence of other deaths similar to that of Toran Henry. It's plainly obvious from his statement a week and a half in to the inquest that it was his opinion that in his 8 years as a coroner he knew that it was 'very uncommon' for SSRIs to be linked with suicide and he had great sympathy for 'the psychiatric registrar' ie Zoran Simovik.

The same Zoran Simovik who told Toran to stop his Prozac on Fridays, drink up to 6 bottles of beer a night over the weekend and resume the Prozac on Mondays. Incidently, not one of the 7 psychiatrists who testified at the inquest said this was a problem!

The Psychiatrist's that gave evidence at Toran Henry's inquest will have you believe that our children are no longer normal, they will tell you of the magic bullets, the quick fixes and the biological defects in the brain, ie; the chemical imbalance, the only imbalance is when the child starts taking the damn drug, it's the psychiatric drugs that impair the brain and not some imbalance that we, as humans, are born with.

Early intervention programs bypass your child going to the doctor because he was...well, because he was being a kid. He may have thrown a tantrum at school, he may have belched loudly in the classroom and then swore, he may have drew a picture of a man with a gun shooting at another man with a gun, he may fall asleep in the classroom or he may just be seeking attention because he wants to be popular - there's the criteria to dope him up to the eyeballs because all of the above would fit in to psychiatries disorders or children.

A child cannot be a child anymore. Long gone are the days of feeling loss, anger, remorse, guilt, anxiety, worry, fear, enthusiasm, exhilaration et al. Children's emotions are being suppressed by pharmaceutical fraud, they saw a market and they tapped right in to it with psychiatry as their vendor.

The early intervention programs, the carefully designed questionnaires, the labelling of mental disorders are all part of the commercial enterprise. Children and adolescents are caught in this enterprise because of the influence of the pharmaceutical industry.

If Toran Henry would have been born in 1950, he'd probably be celebrating his 61st birthday this year. That's the harsh reality of it all.

With a growing number of deaths related to the use of psychiatric drugs, we are in the middle of tectonic plates, they haven't quite rubbed together yet but they are sending out tremors. With each new "disorder" invented by psychiatry, the plates get closer and closer. We, as humans, are allowing this to happen because it is something we fail to see, we put our trust in psychiatrists whom, we believe, can see what we can't. They can't. We are on the verge of a psychiatric tsunami, it won't be waves of sea water coming at us, it will be the tears of those mourning the loss of a loved one...and we stood by and let it happen.

If those mentioned in this article wish to defend their profession, send me one of those carefully designed questionnaires. You want to make a difference? Stop fucking with our future and go take your psycho babble clap-trap to your God and ask him if he agrees with what it is you are doing to the children of this world.

Toran's voice has been heard and not one of you have been here to suppress it.

I bid you a peaceful and drug free future.

Oh, by the way, Toran sends you his middle finger.


Fid

Author of the book; The evidence, however, is clear...the Seroxat Scandal - Chipmunka Publishing [Launch date April 2011]


[1] Fluox (fluoxetine) belongs to the group of antidepressants known as SSRIs and is from the same drug (fluoxetine) as Prozac.
[2] The Cartwright Inquiry was a Commission of Inquiry held in New Zealand from 1987 - 1988. It was commissioned by the then Minister of Health, Michael Bassett to investigate the alleged malpractice of Associate Professor Herb Green.
[3] Antidepressant Medications for Children and Adolescents: Information for Parents and Caregivers. [Source]


Coming soon, Part IV - Mother on a mission.


ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING
Read More ->
Share/Bookmark