tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10459981.post6625100594680686405..comments2023-09-28T15:35:46.255+01:00Comments on <center>FIDDAMAN BLOG</center>: MHRA - Has the penny finally dropped?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10459981.post-32537422988394378482008-04-12T18:44:00.000+01:002008-04-12T18:44:00.000+01:00Just for the record that GSK ISP reads my [U.S.A]b...Just for the record that GSK ISP reads my [U.S.A]blog too.<BR/><BR/>Patients are demanding truth and integrity all over the world.<BR/><BR/>There are MORE of US than them; maybe they will finally figure THAT out.soulful sepulcherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12271584927611299868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10459981.post-27952738605086869032008-04-12T15:19:00.000+01:002008-04-12T15:19:00.000+01:00This is interesting..To be honest i think Mr woods...This is interesting..<BR/>To be honest i think Mr woods looked extremely embarassed and uncomfortable when he was interviewed about GSK witholding the seroxat data..<BR/>The letter seemed to me to be him holding back his disgust and anger at JP garnier ..<BR/>I think if anyone in the MHRA can be reached it is Mr Woods..<BR/>Breckenridge has already shown his true colours on Panorama ..His attitude was appalling..<BR/>Ian Hudson is a different matter, but still there is something very suspect about his involvement in the seroxat scandal..<BR/>The fact that he was involved with Seroxat when he worked for Glaxo and then declined to attend the paliamentary hearing ..<BR/>Breckenridge made some excuse about him having other duties to fulfill..<BR/>He was also interviwed when he worked for Glaxo lawyers in America at a deposition where Seroxat was found partly to blame for a tiple homicide/suicide.. (Donald Shell) ..<BR/>It seems Mr Hudson has information on Seroxat but he seems keen on keepin it to himself..<BR/>And it seems Mr Hudson is intending to keep his mouth shut about what he knows or what he doesn't know about Seroxat and GSK..<BR/>I would be interested to know what connection Breckenridge and Hudson have with GSK..<BR/>As I am sure would thousands of other people who have been following the Seroxat scandal like an Agatha Christie Novel ..(journalists, the media, MP's , patients etc) ..Truthman30https://www.blogger.com/profile/13472167017897959954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10459981.post-62412219726344019622008-04-12T14:10:00.000+01:002008-04-12T14:10:00.000+01:00Yes, how he reacts would certainly be an indicator...Yes, how he reacts would certainly be an indicator as to how he views the stated fact (by you and me, if nobody else), that patients have no faith in the MHRA to achieve its stated aim (protecting the public from shite drugs). Do any of the key players in this farce genuinely concern themselves with this, or is it simply the case that there is another bunch of uninformed mugs, just round the corner, who are only too happy to lob a few pills down their throats, in the hopes that this will cure their ills, and thus those who have been impacted negatively are irrelevant? It won't of course (cure anybody's ills - at least not in the mental health arena), but it makes lots of money, and will be defended to the last because of that (OCD extends to the collection of money, too, you see).<BR/><BR/>It would be interesting to see the reaction in Bedford, when GSK views the latest of your missives, Bob! Trial and error is all very well, but requires feedback to be a truly effective methodology. One begins to wonder who the mentally ill are!<BR/><BR/>MattRadagasthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14286529284742690239noreply@blogger.com