Zantac Lawsuit


Researching drug company and regulatory malfeasance for over 16 years
Humanist, humorist

Tuesday, October 08, 2024

Closing One Chapter, Opening Another: A Farewell to the Blog and a New Beginning

 




It’s hard to believe I’m sitting here, writing this post—the one I always knew would come someday, but hoped I could put off just a little longer. After nearly two decades of pouring my heart and soul into this blog, I find myself at a crossroads. It’s not an easy thing to walk away from something that has become such a core part of your life, but as time moves forward, so must I.

When I first hit "publish" on my very first blog post back in 2006, I had no idea where this journey would lead. It was just me, a keyboard, and a burning need to speak out about an issue that was close to my heart—the dangers of antidepressants. I never expected that this little corner of the internet would grow the way it has. Over 3 million hits later, I’m still amazed by the power of community, of shared stories, and the ripple effect that raising awareness can create. This blog became so much more than I could have ever dreamed.

And yet, here we are—on the brink of something new. Today, I’m announcing that this space, which has been my constant companion, my outlet, my platform, and even my refuge, is stepping back to make room for a new chapter: a podcast. It’s with a mixture of excitement and sadness that I close one door and prepare to open another.

Before I step into the unknown of podcasting, I want to take a moment to reflect on all that has been accomplished here. Together, we’ve shone a light on the very real and often hidden dangers of antidepressants. Through this platform, we’ve challenged the narrative that these drugs are harmless or even helpful for everyone. We’ve dug deep into the data, listened to real people’s experiences, and called for accountability where it was sorely lacking. The countless conversations sparked here, the stories you’ve shared with me, and the sense of community we’ve built have far exceeded anything I ever imagined when I started writing all those years ago.

There’s something deeply personal about the written word. It’s intimate. It’s raw. And over the years, this blog has been a place where I’ve not only shared information but connected with so many of you on a personal level. Many of you have been with me since the early days, sharing your own struggles, victories, and even heartbreaks. Your courage and honesty have fueled my own passion for this cause. The friendships I’ve made through this blog are something I will always carry with me, no matter where this journey takes me next.

There have been some incredible milestones along the way—moments that I still look back on with pride and a sense of purpose. Winning not one, but two Human Rights Awards from CCHR stands out as a highlight. It felt like a validation of all the long hours, the research, the late nights spent writing and rewriting, driven by a commitment to give a voice to those who felt silenced. Yet, as much as those awards meant to me, what mattered more were the countless messages and emails from people who said, "This blog made me feel less alone." That’s what this has always been about—community, solidarity, and advocacy.

Having my book, "The Evidence, However, is Clear, the Seroxat Scandal", published too was a great achievement for me, it helped spread the word and, as I understand, helped many people understand the dangers of Seroxat and other SSRIs.

But times are changing. The world moves fast, and while blogging has been my go-to platform for nearly 18 years, I’ve watched as new platforms and new advocates have risen to prominence. And it’s been a thrill to see that happen. There’s a new generation stepping up, full of energy and determination, and they’re continuing the fight with a vigor that’s contagious. The battle against the over-prescription and under-regulation of antidepressants is far from over, and in many ways, it feels like it’s just beginning for them. These younger voices are calling for change in a way that is fresh, bold, and urgent.

So, it’s with this new wave of advocacy in mind that I’m moving into a new format: podcasting. The written word has served me well, but now, I’m excited to bring conversations to life in a more dynamic way. "Two Boring Old Men" is the next phase of this journey, and while the title might sound light-hearted, the conversations will be as serious and necessary as ever. I believe this format will allow for deeper, more nuanced conversations—ones that I hope will resonate with a new and broader audience.

And yet, as I say all of this, I can’t help but feel the weight of what I’m leaving behind. This blog has been a huge part of my life for nearly two decades. Letting it go feels like closing a chapter that I’ve been writing for so long that I almost don’t remember what life was like before it. It’s hard to walk away from something that has been a constant companion. But I know, deep down, that it’s time. Time to step back, time to explore new opportunities, and time to trust that the seeds planted here will continue to grow in the hands of others. The blog will remain in place but I won't be adding any more stories/articles to it. It's still a rich source of information for many new to this dark world of antidepressant regulation and safety.

Before I sign off, I want to say thank you. Thank you to each and every one of you who has taken the time to read a post, leave a comment, send me an email, or share your own story. Thank you for being part of this community—for making this blog so much more than just a collection of articles. It has been a collective effort, and I’m deeply grateful for the friendships, the support, and the shared passion for justice. You’ve all made this journey worthwhile, and I will carry that with me forever.

I hope you’ll follow me into this next chapter. "Two Boring Old Men" is just getting started, and I’m confident it will be an enjoyable, engaging, and enlightening experience for us all. New conversations and new subject matter for Two Boring Old Men to pursue. You can find the podcast on our website, twoboringoldmen.com, and we’ve also set up a TikTok account where we’ll be sharing clips and updates at https://www.tiktok.com/@twoboringoldmen

With gratitude, and a heavy heart,

Bob Fiddaman

Friday, September 13, 2024

My Two Books

 





NO OTHER MAN








Bob Fiddaman

Friday, August 23, 2024

IMMINENT: A review of Lue Elizondo's Book

 




I read Lue Elizondo's latest book, Imminent, in just three days, a reflection of my long-standing interest in ufology—now commonly referred to as uapology, which humorously sounds like the study of apologies. My fascination began back in 1976 when I witnessed strange lights in the sky. The release of Close Encounters of the Third Kind in 1977 deepened my enthusiasm for this subject, prompting many, myself included, to "watch the skies." For over two decades, I avidly followed developments in ufology until 1997, when, in a moment reminiscent of Roy Neary, I discarded all my magazines and newspaper clippings. I reached a point where I felt certain that the truth about extraterrestrial life would never be uncovered. Luckily, I never had to dismantle a plasticine model of Devil's Tower, but I was deeply affected by the actions of the Heaven’s Gate cult, led by Marshall Applewhite, which ultimately pushed me away from the subject.


In 1997, as the comet Hale-Bopp made its notable pass near Earth—its closest approach in 4,000 years—Marshall Applewhite and 38 of his followers took their lives in a misguided belief that it would allow them to leave their physical bodies, board an alien spacecraft, and ascend to a higher existence. This event was disconcerting and illuminated how deeply exploring ufology could sometimes warp one's reasoning. It would be another 20 years before I re-engaged with this topic. In 2017, a New York Times article about a secret government agency investigating UFO phenomena shattered my assumption that the subject was purely fictional. Elizondo dives into the NYT article in his book, tracing its origins, which I found to be even more fascinating than the UAP themes themselves.


Elizondo possesses an impressive gift for communication; I’ve listened to nearly all of his podcasts, and his writing style is equally compelling. I pre-ordered the Kindle version of Imminent, while my partner bought the audio version, which she hasn’t yet listened to. I've shared one particularly moving segment with her, but I won’t give away any spoilers here—I'll simply say that La Vie en Rose serves as an intriguing teaser. This song was played during my father's funeral, resonating with his romantic spirit, as he often enjoyed Edith Piaf's classic. Elizondo recounts his long journeys to be with his terminally ill mother, echoing my own experience of racing from Panama to the UK during the pandemic to be with my dying father. I broke quarantine to spend valuable time with him—what choice would anyone have made?


Throughout Imminent, Elizondo discusses numerous alleged UFO sightings, landings, and crashes, drawing heavily on recent military encounters that dedicated ufology enthusiasts will likely recognize. Notably, he explores some underwater encounters that raise intriguing questions. However, I wish the book had delved into any investigations related to transmedium vehicles, particularly how the minerals in water might influence energy production. It would have been interesting to learn whether scientists have explored such connections.


When asked if I have heroes, my answer is always, "All my heroes are heroines." In Imminent, you'll come to realize that Elizondo's wife, Jennifer, is the true hero of this narrative. While Lue’s perseverance in the face of challenges deserves recognition, opinions will inevitably vary in an age where folks often take to their keyboards to critique rather than engage with real struggles. I recently saw a comment on X that criticized Elizondo for not publishing something, which I found bewildering.


Overall, Imminent offers a compelling look into the inner workings of clandestine U.S. government activities and recounts the journey filled with obstacles that advocates, myself included—specifically in patient safety—often endure in pursuit of truth. I commend all those who, despite facing continuous resistance, press on. A salute to both Lue and his wife, Jennifer.


Bob Fiddaman




Friday, May 24, 2024

Rockstar Law Firm to Lead Baby Food Litigation

 


On May 17, 2024, a federal judge overseeing the Baby Food Products Liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 3101) appointed R. Brent Wisner and Aimee Wagstaff as Co-Lead Counsel, along with several members of a Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee to lead the litigation for plaintiffs alleging toxic heavy metals in commercial baby food caused their children to develop autism or ADHD. Wisner emphasized the importance of ensuring the safety of baby food and seeking justice for affected families. The lawsuits were consolidated into a mass tort overseen by District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in the Northern District of San Francisco. 

Wisner Baum, based in Los Angeles, represents thousands of children affected by heavy metals in baby foods, including lead, mercury, and inorganic arsenic. The litigation aims to hold companies like Beech-Nut, Gerber, and Walmart accountable for selling products tainted with heavy metals. The appointed attorneys on the steering committee are dedicated to achieving a fair outcome and advocating for affected children. The mass tort includes numerous federal lawsuits nationwide, alleging that toxic metals in baby foods have led to long-term health issues for children.

Here's what Co-lead counsel Brent Wisner had to say:

“Ensuring the safety of baby food is paramount for our children's’ well-being, and I am honored to be appointed to lead this critical MDL. The evidence we've gathered over the past two years is compelling, and we are prepared to present a robust case to secure justice for the families affected. This litigation is not just about compensation; it's about protecting the health and future of our children. When food companies make billions selling food containing poison—food that is simply unfit for human consumption, let alone a baby’s consumption — there needs to be accountability.  This litigation is a first step in dealing with a generation of babies that have been poisoned and now face an epidemic of autism."

“This tight-knit group of attorneys is chalk full of rockstars,” according to Wisner. “We have some of the sharpest legal minds in the Plaintiffs’ bar. These Defendants have no idea what’s coming.”

The judge’s pretrial order can be downloaded here.

Bob Fiddaman

--

Previously on this blog


Wednesday, January 26, 2022

Baby Foods Contain "Staggering Amounts" of Toxic Heavy Metals, Lawsuit Alleges

https://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2022/01/baby-foods-contain-staggering-amounts.html

Thursday, May 26, 2022

Toxic Baby Food, the Subject of Lawsuit

https://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2022/05/toxic-baby-food-subject-of-lawsuit.html


Thursday, November 03, 2022

Toxic Baby Food Trial Set for 2023

https://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2022/11/toxic-baby-food-trial-set-for-2023.html


Thursday, February 15, 2024

Baby food makers pursue 9-year-old with autism for $600,000

https://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2024/02/baby-food-makers-pursue-9-year-old-with.html


Saturday, April 13, 2024

Baby Food Brain Injury Lawsuit Looms

https://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2024/04/baby-food-brain-injury-lawsuit-looms.html


Saturday, April 13, 2024

Baby Food Brain Injury Lawsuit Looms

 



On April 11, 2024, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) made a significant decision, consolidating all federally filed lawsuits concerning baby food. This consolidation resulted in the creation of MDL No. 3101, named In re: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation, to be presided over by the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley, serving in the Northern District of California. R. Brent Wisner, the managing partner at Wisner Baum, who presented arguments before the JPML in March, released the following statement in response to the establishment of the Baby Food MDL:


“We are excited about the JPML's ruling. We have been assigned a smart and accomplished jurist and we think the Northern District of California is the right venue for this case. The next step is to get this MDL organized and get the new judge up to speed on the two years of litigation we have already done. This mass tort is going to end up being one of the most important litigations in recent history. Baby food must be safe, and these Defendants not only know that some of their products aren't, but they refused to be honest with parents about it. It’s difficult to fathom the scope of brain injury that has been inflicted on babies in this country. This MDL is the first step in taking account of the full scope of that damage and, hopefully, finding some justice for the children whose lives have been forever disadvantaged.”


Representatives for Gerber, Beech-Nut and Campbell, which opposed the creation of an MDL, have yet to comment publicly.

What is MDL

Imagine you have a bunch of people who all have similar legal claims against the same company, like if many people got sick from the same medicine. Instead of each person filing a separate lawsuit all over the country, those cases might be grouped together in one court. That's an MDL, where one judge handles all the pretrial stuff to make things faster and more efficient. After that, each case might go back to its original court for trial, or sometimes they get settled together. It's like a legal shortcut to deal with a bunch of related cases at once.

While there isn't a precise overall percentage for settlements in Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) cases, settlements are quite common in these proceedings. Many MDL cases are resolved through settlement negotiations before they reach trial. The exact percentage varies depending on the specific MDL and the nature of the claims involved. However, it's not uncommon for a significant portion of MDL cases to be resolved through settlements, as they offer both plaintiffs and defendants the opportunity to avoid the uncertainty and expense of a trial.

Bob Fiddaman

Previously on this blog:

Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Merck Hit with Two New Wrongful Death Suits Over Gardasil

 


Isabella Zuggi and Sydney Figueroa, before and after Gardasil


Last week, Wisner Baum's vaccine attorneys initiated two fresh wrongful death litigations. One was filed on behalf of a North Carolina mother, asserting that Merck's Gardasil HPV vaccine led to the demise of her 10-year-old daughter. The other lawsuit, representing a Pennsylvania mother, alleges that Gardasil caused the passing of her 12-year-old daughter. Both cases argue that the HPV vaccine triggered severe autoimmune and neurological complications, culminating in the tragic loss of their daughters.


Monique Alarcon, Bijan Esfandiari, Michael L. Baum, and Stephanie B. Sherman, attorneys specializing in Gardasil lawsuits, are representing Kristine Zuggi. Zuggi's daughter, Isabella, a vibrant fifth-grader, tragically passed away merely ten weeks following her Gardasil vaccination. Additionally, they're representing Lynne Guzman, whose 12-year-old daughter, Sydney Figueroa, became wheelchair-bound post-vaccination and sadly succumbed shortly thereafter.

The lawsuits target Merck & Co., Inc., a pharmaceutical powerhouse based in New Jersey, and its subsidiary, Merck Sharp & Dohme. The allegations are as follows:

1/ Merck consistently jeopardizes lives despite being fully aware of Gardasil's limited effectiveness and significant risks.

2/ Merck knowingly neglects to inform both the public and healthcare providers about the potential for injury or fatality associated with Gardasil.

3/ Merck is accused of perpetuating an aggressive propaganda campaign aimed at instilling fear and guilt in parents to compel them to vaccinate their children with Gardasil.

4/ Merck deliberately introduced a substantial risk of harm to children and patients who received Gardasil injections, thus justifying the awarding of punitive damages.

“The senseless deaths of these two beautiful young girls brings home the seriousness of the allegations against Merck in these cases–that the company has exaggerated the benefits of Gardasil as cancer preventative and ignored the risks, including death–all for the sake of the company’s bottom line” said Wisner Baum attorney, Monique Alarcon.

Isabella Zuggi, a vibrant 10-year-old who adored Harry Potter, received her first and only Gardasil injection on August 26, 2022, with no prior health concerns. Two weeks later, she began experiencing headaches, lethargy, stomach pains, body aches, and intermittent fevers. An infectious disease consult revealed she had MOG antibodies, associated with acute, inflammatory, demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. The complaint alleges a link between MOG antibody disorders and several vaccines, including Gardasil, which research identifies as a common trigger for central nervous system demyelination. Isabella tragically passed away on November 5, 2022, with her death attributed to Acute Encephalitis Associated with Anti-MOG Antibody Production. Her mother, Kristine, regrets not being informed of Gardasil's potential risks and feels pressured by Merck's marketing tactics into vaccinating her daughter for cervical cancer protection.

Sydney Figueroa, aged 11 at her first Gardasil dose in December 2017 and 12 at the second, was an accomplished student and athlete, active in soccer, track, and band. Post-vaccination, she suffered from a plethora of debilitating symptoms including headaches, fatigue, and neurological issues, eventually leading to her confinement to a wheelchair and full-time care. Diagnosed with POTS, Tourette's Syndrome, and Functional Neurological Disorder, Sydney tragically passed away on June 2, 2021, due to a pulmonary embolism resulting from prolonged immobility caused by autoimmune diseases triggered by Gardasil. The wrongful death complaint contends that Julie Gerberding, then CDC Director, overlooked evidence of Gardasil's unproven efficacy and potential dangers during the regulatory process.

Sydney’s mother, Lynne, said, “Gardasil destroyed my daughter’s life. She fought for as long as she could but the injuries she suffered, ultimately, killed her. If I knew what I know now, I never would have let Sydney get the shots.”

Wrongful death complaints have been lodged in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina (Case No. 3:22-md-03036-KDB). These cases are joining the Gardasil multidistrict litigation (In Re: Gardasil Products Liability Litigation, MDL 3036), which encompasses over 150 related cases awaiting resolution.

The press release can be read, in full, here.

Bob Fiddaman

--

Previously on this blog

"I don’t want this pain for other kids." ~ Victoria Trevisan, Gardasil Victim

Merck & Co Face Uphill Battle as Gardasil Lawsuits Consolidated

Parents of 13-year-old Boy File Wrongful Death Lawsuit against Vaccine Manufacturers, Merck







Thursday, February 15, 2024

Baby food makers pursue 9-year-old with autism for $600,000

 



Back in September, 2022, I wrote about the case of Noah Cantabrana, who was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder ASD when he was two years and nine months old.

As a baby and toddler, Noah consumed high amounts of baby foods that were manufactured by the following:

Nurture, Inc. (Happy Family Organics and HappyBABY) of New York

Beech-Nut Nutrition Company of New York

Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (Earth’s Best Organic) of New York

Gerber Products Company of Michigan

Plum PBC (Plum Organics) of California

Walmart, Inc. (Parent’s Choice) of Arkansas

Sprout Foods, Inc. of New Jersey

Noah's parents initiated legal action, alleging that their son's consumption of high quantities of baby foods led to a diagnosis of ASD and ADHD.

Attorneys representing the Cantabrana family assert that young children exposed to toxic metals through baby food products face an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. This heightened risk stems from the fact that the brains of infants and toddlers are still in the crucial stages of development.

Babies and toddlers are particularly vulnerable to metal exposure due to their higher food intake relative to their body weight and their increased susceptibility to metal absorption, which can be 40% to 90% greater than that of adults. Moreover, their bodies have less developed mechanisms for metabolizing and eliminating heavy metals, coupled with weaker detoxification and immune systems compared to adults.

Research indicates that even at low levels, exposure to heavy metals can result in severe and irreversible neurological damage, potentially leading to conditions such as autism and ADHD. A notable study conducted by the National Institutes of Health, which focused on twins to mitigate genetic influences, highlighted the role of early-life exposure to heavy metals like lead in influencing the risk of autism spectrum disorder.

In September 2021, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of Noah to address these concerns and seek appropriate legal recourse.

In 2022, a judge in the Los Angeles Superior Court permitted Noah's case to proceed, ruling that the opinions of the plaintiff's experts, asserting that heavy metals could be a significant factor in causing ASD and ADHD, were admissible.

Subsequently, in September 2023, another judge acknowledged that the opinions of Noah's experts, linking exposure to heavy metals to autism and ADHD, were grounded in solid scientific evidence. However, the case was dismissed due to a technicality. During a hearing, this judge rejected crucial expert witness testimony regarding the calculation of the dose of heavy metals ingested through baby food, thereby preventing Noah's case from reaching a jury.

Now, it seems that the multinational corporations associated with brands such as Beech-Nut, Hain Celestial (Earth’s Best), and Sprout Organics, as well as retailers like Walmart (Parent’s Choice), Nurture (Happy Family), and Plum Organics, will seek to compel Noah Cantabrana, a fourth-grader from Temecula, Calif., to pay over half a million dollars following the dismissal of his lawsuit against these companies.

You read it right. 

“Six of the largest baby food manufacturers in the world, who claim to focus on the health and well-being of our children, seek to make an example of a nine-year-old boy with autism for daring to sue them,” said Noah’s attorney, Pedram Esfandiary, a partner of Los Angeles-based Wisner Baum. "The companies’ sole purpose in seeking such an obscene cost is a twisted desire to punish Noah."

The defendants in Noah's case included seven of the world's leading baby food manufacturers: Walmart, Beech-Nut, Gerber, Hain Celestial ("Earth's Best"), Sprout Organics, Plum Organics, and Nurture ("Happy Family").

All of these companies, except Gerber, are pursuing legal action against Noah.

In their court brief, the companies seeking to hold Noah accountable for costs argued that their request is reasonable. They emphasized that the assessment of costs should not be influenced by the identity of the plaintiff or the defendant, contrary to the plaintiff's assertion. According to them, when a plaintiff initiates a lawsuit and does not succeed, they are legally responsible for each category of recoverable costs.

According to ABC News - Noah's attorney is urging the judge to reject the request from the baby food makers, and asserted that, Defendants—large, wealthy, multinational corporations—aim to impose $636,731.91 in litigation costs on a nine-year-old child grappling with neurodevelopmental disorders. He added, "This move by the defendants not only lacks decency but also goes against legal principles, fairness, and basic common sense."

Esfandiary is counting on public support to intervene in this matter.

“I urge everyone, contact these companies, put pressure on them to abandon this attempt to destroy a young man's life," said Esfandiary.

The ruling does not bar the advancement of future cases related to baby food.

Bob Fiddaman

Thursday, February 08, 2024

Joey Marino: Trapped in a Living Hell

 


The following is a guest post from author and researcher, Beverley Thomson.

Bev has featured on this blog in the past, here and here.

--

I wrote this article for Joey Marino some time ago and Joey and I intended to publish it. It was never the intention it would be following the news of his passing away on January 14th, 2024.

Joey Marino loved life. He always had hope until the doctors so willing to prescribe the drugs had finally given up on their victim. “You have a one percent chance of getting better. There is nothing we can do. It is incurable.” “It” was incurable iatrogenic damage caused by legally prescribed medication. Joey’s hours and hours of voice messages and our conversations convinced me his life must be a lesson to us all; most importantly that one prescription for a psychiatric medication can lead to a life ruined by poly-drugging and entrapment in a mental health system unfit for purpose. In what kind of health system can patients become so vulnerable that every living hour of every day is a constant fight to stay alive? Joey Marino did not want to die and if anyone asks, it was peacefully, in his sleep. What actually killed him should be a lesson to us all.

--

March, 2023

At 63, Joey Marino is trapped in a living hell. His body is controlled by Tardive Dyskinesia and Akathisia. Constant involuntary repetitive body movements like jerking, writhing, grimacing, sticking out his tongue and the smacking of his mouth and lips are the result of eight years of poly-drugging with psychiatric medications. “How I am alive I do not know”, he tells me. It started with a prescription for Prozac during a period of situational anxiety. He became suicidal within days, something he had never previously experienced. “I don’t think my body will hold up much longer, but I don’t want to die. To be or not to be that is the question” he told me in a recent voice message.

This resonated for so many reasons and took me back to my school days when I studied Hamlet. "To be or not to be"; is the first line of a famous soliloquy from William Shakespeare’s play Hamlet. Prince Hamlet thinks about life, death, and suicide. He wonders whether it might be preferable to commit suicide to end one's suffering and to leave behind the pain and agony associated with living. However, he quickly changes his tune when he considers that nobody knows for sure what happens after death, namely whether there is an afterlife and whether this afterlife might be even worse than life. This realization is what ultimately gives Hamlet (and others, he reasons) "pause" when it comes to action. Hamlet fears the uncertainty dying brings and is tormented by the possibility of ending up in Hell—a place even more miserable than life.

Joey Marino describes his life now as “one in hell” and like Hamlet, his troubles are numerous and unending. For years he was judged to be mentally ill because no professional picked up on the fact it was the medications causing adverse reactions and making him increasingly debilitated. Repeatedly abruptly withdrawn from drugs, reinstated, dosages increased, given cocktails of antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics and never any acknowledgement it was iatrogenic harm. He was Gaslit by professionals and family and made to feel guilty for his understandable anger and resolute inability to forgive those who have harmed him.

Joey is an actor and lives in California. He worked for years on the successful TV drama ER. He tells me he was previously obsessed with true emotion. He was a storyteller, communicator, a connector who lived life spontaneously, always taking care of himself mentally and physically.

Many people think these cases are rare…they are not. No one knows how a drug will affect them until they take it. Why do we often not remember life gives us the opportunity to be our true authentic self, unharmed and undamaged by unnecessary drugs. We all have the choice to learn about these drugs and the harm they have the potential to cause. We all have the right to take them if we wish but we should be informed there are no guarantees they will not change the course of our life. The number of suicides caused by akathisia is undoubtedly hidden, often willfully by the powers that be. If suicide prevention organizations truly wish to reduce suicide rates, then prescription drug-induced suicide is an issue they must address. Whether it be because of relentless thoughts of suicide or the intolerable physical adverse effects, in some cases prescription medications are killing us. It is very easy to find many celebrities who have perhaps ended their lives due to akathisia.

“Creatives are sensitive souls” Joey tells me. “This does not need to happen to people, and it is happening every day. Neurologists have nothing to offer when the harm is done.” At this time, I agree, though there appears to be a new generation of professionals who seem to make spurious claims about regeneration of our brains and nervous system. We must wonder if the damage, in some cases is ever repairable. Time will tell.

I like Joey Marino and feel privileged to know him. The nine-hour time difference between us has done nothing to prevent me understanding his true selfless and charming character. I hope we can find someone who can help him…I hope someone is out there. I hope we learn from his courageous suffering.

Few of us will have the opportunity to play Hamlet……every one of us has the chance to become Joey. Don’t let it be you.

--

Joey passed away on January 14th, 2024.

--

Beverley Thomson is a writer, researcher and speaker with a focus on psychiatric medication including antidepressants, benzodiazepines and ADHD drugs; their history, how the drugs work, adverse effects, dependence, withdrawal and development of patient support services. Her aim is to help inform and empower the patient to make informed choices about medication. She has a particular interest in withdrawal management and prescription drug-induced suicide. In the past 10 years, she has worked with organizations such as the British Medical Association, the Scottish Government (as part of a working group addressing the issue of prescribed drug harm and dependence in Scotland), the UK Council for Evidence-Based Psychiatry (writing evidence-based summaries to be used by professionals and the general public), and the UK All Party Parliamentary Group for Prescribed Drug Dependence. She has contributed to articles in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and mainstream media including TV and radio.

Thursday, January 25, 2024

Families Lodge Complaints Over Seroxat, Citing Adverse Reactions Leading to Tragic Outcomes

 


Romain Schmitt, 16

Last week, Radio France ran a heartbreaking story about two young men who tragically died after taking the controversial antidepressant paroxetine. Paroxetine is more commonly known by its brand names, including Seroxat (UK), Paxil (US & Canada), and Aropax (Australia & New Zealand). The bereaved families are fighting to establish the link between the taking of Seroxat and these two suicides.

The story, investigated by journalists Par Rozenn Le Saint and BenoĂ®t Collombat, can be read in full here. 

Vincent Schmitt and Yoko Motohama, parents of Romain, who was 16 years old when he tragically ended his life in September 2021, are now seeking justice. Convinced that their son's death is linked to the use of Seroxat, they have filed a complaint for involuntary manslaughter, focusing on the potential connection between the young man's suicide and the Seroxat he was prescribed.

The parents assert that their son's behavior underwent a transformation between 2-3 months after taking Seroxat, an SSRI marketed and manufactured by GSK, which exacerbated his anxiety. "It was hell," Vincent Schmitt recounted. Adding that Romain began engaging in gambling and obsessively focused on football games. His behavior became increasingly worrisome, and he directed anger towards them.

Most notably, the teenager seemed to lose all sense of danger. "One day, he impulsively swam in a lake without regard for safety. His rescue came thanks to a pedal boat," Vincent Schmitt recalled.

Around 3 months after being on Seroxat, Romain's sleeping cycle was completely reversed. His parents complained to the prescribing doctor, and bizarrely, his Seroxat dosage was increased. What started as a 10mg daily dosage, ended (by 31/2 months) to 40 mg/day. The prescriber then added Tercian to the mix before taking a 1-month vacation. Tercian, also known as Cyamemazine or cyamepromazine, is a typical antipsychotic drug. When combined with SSRIs, it increases the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Extrapyramidal effects refer to involuntary movements that cannot be controlled. An example of this is akathisia.

For years, GSK has steadfastly denied any connection between their best-selling SSRI and suicide completion. Despite reaching numerous out-of-court settlements with victims' families, they maintain that Seroxat is safe and effective. 

Over the years, this blog has extensively documented Seroxat-related suicides, with particular emphasis on the tragic case of Sara Carlin, a young Canadian girl who tragically took her own life. Sara's story also holds a prominent place in my book, 'The Evidence, However, Is Clear...The Seroxat Scandal.'

Sara's death at the hands of Seroxat prompted a series of recommendations at her inquest, a list that can be read here.

I reached out to Romain's mother, Yoko, to learn more about her son, Romain and what happened on that fateful day. She told me:

"I was sitting on the bench at the entrance of the station, enjoying the end of the summer's sun while waiting for Romain. It is such a tiny station, not even 10 meters away. Little did I know that Romain was already on the platform.

"From where I sat, I could see the school's entrance. It was after school, and all the kids were leaving. I heard a loud noise, possibly a train, followed by a strange silence and people reacting oddly. I started to worry that we might be late for our appointment with the psychiatrist for Romain.

"Teachers rushed to the station, and I noticed signs indicating that the train was delayed. Concerned about our appointment, I decided to call Vincent to request a car pickup. As I dialed his number, I began searching for Romain and approached a teacher to inquire about my son's whereabouts. The teacher asked for his name, and I replied, 'Romain Schmitt.' To my surprise, she abruptly left without saying a word, which struck me as strange.

"Soon, ambulances arrived, and a sense of unease began to intensify. Many firefighters gathered around me, and a man in a white coat approached. He delivered the devastating news that Romain was dead.

"For me, this marked the beginning of a profound sense of despair and loss. This is my story of that tragic day, a day that would forever be associated with suicide."

I asked Yoko what Romain was diagnosed with, she told me:

"That is also part of the question we are asking. Actually, no doctor gave us any official diagnosis. Romain liked sports and was very healthy. He liked footballers, like Christian Ronaldo. So, like many other boys of his age, he started muscle training. At the same time, he started doing a kind of special diet.

"Getting quite escalated and obsessed, his eating habit became painful to our family. Removing all fat parts, juice, sauce on the plate, and requesting a specific product, etc. But I could not really discuss with him, and he did not listen to me. He also needed to take a shower before football. He was not good at waking up in the morning to prepare for school and was always late for dinner because he needed to do muscle training just before eating, etc.

"Anyway, witnessing his new eating habits, we started seeking some help from specialists. But nothing was helpful. At the same time, I was searching on the internet what a disease could be. And we found that it can be an obsessive-compulsive disorder.

"The first psychiatrist we saw didn't believe Romain had OCD so we took him to see another. Within 20 minutes of seeing the 2nd psychiatrist, we were told that Romain's habits were a "serious disorder". Romain was then started on Seroxat."

Approximately one month later, Romain's eating habits seemed to level out, he became less obsessed with his previous dietary regime. However, he seemed to be sleeping most of the time. This, according to Yoko, was during the Covid lockdown. Things became estranged between Yoko and Romain and shortly after his dietary obsession returned.

Romain, nor his parents were informed by the prescribing psychiatrist about Seroxat's propensity to induce suicidal thinking. His father, Vincent, did, however, read the patient information leaflet where, hidden amongst the minor side-effects, was the warning about increased suicidality when taking Seroxat, particularly for patients of Romain's age.

Yoko told me, "On Friday, the morning prior to his death, he planned with his good friend to participate in some sports, and then do some homework together over the weekend. At the canteen, Romain had lunch with many friends and laughed a lot while sharing a banana."

Hours later, Romain, at the age of 16, tragically ended his life by stepping in front of a moving train.

After his death Romain's parents researched the link between Seroxat and suicidality, it was then they learned of many others who had taken their lives whilst taking GSK's powerful, mind-altering antidepressant.

Too little, too late for them but they want to warn others.

--

Gilles and Giusiana Mannoni have, along with Yoko and Vincent, also filed a complaint after their 20-year-old son, Florian, hanged himself. His father told the France Bleu website, “We learned on Thursday evening around 10 p.m. that Florian had hanged himself."

"A week later, when we gained access to the apartment, we found a prescription with a drug based on paroxetine. Florian's psychiatrist explained to us that he did not have a problem with his family or his friends, but just a problem with a rumbling in his stomach, that he was not depressed. I asked her why she prescribed the antidepressant, and she told us she prescribed it to everyone.”

Florian was due to go on a skiing trip with his parents.

Both Giles and Giusiana contacted GSK after the death of their son. They were, somewhat, callously told, adverse effects, such as suicidality, appear in the medication leaflet.

Maître Jean-Christophe Coubris, the lawyer representing both families, issued the following statement:

'Like most of us, I will never read a notice in its entirety.' He laments that most people prescribed antidepressants will not have the correct information regarding the increased risk, possibly triggering an irreversible action, which is two to three times higher. 'It's a gigantic umbrella that the laboratories open. You could even call it a parasol. I fear that no one is informed about the risks of over-suicide while taking antidepressants in all age categories."

--

Commentary

Since 2006, I've been researching GSK and Seroxat. In the case of Romain, GSK will argue that Tercian, also known as Cyamemazine, caused the changes in his behavior. This is a classic move that drug companies, and even prescribers, make when their products come under fire. They will blame anything and everything other than the product they are defending. They, along with the prescribing psychiatrist, might even suggest that Romain's apparent OCD pushed him over the edge, along with his strained relationship with his parents.

If this case goes to trial, attorneys will focus on Romain's parents and their friends, attempting to imply that Romain took his life due to their parenting skills. This situation bears a resemblance to what happened to Wendy Dolin when she filed a lawsuit against GSK. Below is an excerpt from an exclusive interview I conducted with Wendy:

"I knew when I filed this lawsuit, it was going to be a very difficult process. But I was unprepared for the sheer number of depositions and subpoenas GSK demanded. I was told this was a record number of requests. I understood the need for certain information, but it became very clear early on that GSK's goal was to send a powerful message to me: That is, when you have the audacity to challenge GSK, all attempts will be made to harass everyone you care dearly about. GSK also repeatedly tried to humiliate me. For example, depositions that should have been a few hours became eight hours in an attempt to wear people down. GSK asked the same question over and over and over again hoping to manipulate, confuse and take people's comments out of context.

"Some of the irrelevant but personal questions GSK asked me included, "How many times do you go to temple? Are you dating anyone? Who are my partners at work?" They even requested Stewart's high school transcripts. All were totally irrelevant and useless questions posed by attorneys from King and Spalding and Dentons. They were calling my friends, not identifying themselves and trying to get people to somehow say terrible things about my relationship with Stewart. There was nothing to say, of course, and GSK's attorneys just embarrassed themselves. It became a joke amongst my friends as to who would be called next and who did GSK think they were dealing with that they thought their sweet talking female attorney was somehow going to get information?"

There is a substantial amount of publicly available history regarding Seroxat on the internet, offering abundant resources for family lawyers to investigate. Unfortunately, such resources were not accessible to other families who lost loved ones to Seroxat over the years. This blog has covered many of these cases, and I'm aware that Yoko has downloaded a significant portion of my work here. It's encouraging to know that Yoko has also reached out to David Healy, who is an expert in SSRI-related issues and has historically been a thorn in GSK's side.

To be frank, I'm astonished that Seroxat is still being prescribed, given its atrocious track record of ruining lives. To give a 16-year-old 40mg of this mind-altering drug is, in my opinion, tantamount to gross negligence.

The journey ahead for both families is bound to be lengthy and filled with numerous obstacles. This endeavor is not driven by a pursuit of financial gain; rather, it's about raising public awareness so that no family has to endure the suffering that the Mannoni's and Schmitt's are currently experiencing.

No parent should ever have to bury their child, especially when such a tragedy could have been prevented, as in both of these cases.

I'd like to thank Vincent and Yoko for helping me clarify the events. It can't have been easy for them reliving such a traumatic experience.

It's worth noting that no formal case has been filed against GSK at this point. Both families have lodged complaints of involuntary manslaughter and these complaints are now being investigated.

If successful, the families could pursue lawsuits against the prescribers, the French regulatory authorities, and even GSK. The complaints are currently in the hands of the prosecutor.

--

Yoko has now created a website that you can view here (https://antidepeffects.wordpress.com/)

A photo album of Romain can also be viewed here (https://romainschmitt.wordpress.com/)

For updates and to offer your support, please follow Yoko's Twitter (X) account here (https://twitter.com/antidepeffects)


Bob Fiddaman


Please contact me if you would like a guest post considered for publication on my blog.