Zantac Lawsuit


Researching drug company and regulatory malfeasance for over 16 years
Humanist, humorist
Showing posts with label ELI LILLY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ELI LILLY. Show all posts

Monday, June 17, 2019

The ADD/ADHD Infomercial





The following video was posted on Facebook 7 years ago. It was sent to me by a concerned father, Alan Berkeley. I watched in utter disbelief at what can be best described as an infomercial broadcast on American TV.

I'm not going to spoil the content for you, sufficed to say, the guest appearance by Dr Edward Hallowell will have you wondering how, or indeed why, we ever bought into the methods of diagnosing ADD/ADHD.

Before viewing the video (below) it's worthy to note that this "expert" has had ties, in the past, to Eli Lilly, Novartis and McNeil Pediatrics. Further, he has been a paid consultant for Dore Clinics.

As if taking money from drug companies wasn't bad enough, in 2015 Hallowell was charged with indecent assault on a young make-up artist. The charge was later dropped by the young woman. Initially, he was accused of squeezing her buttocks. Hallowell, it was alleged, put his hand on her shoulder and touched her.  "He followed my shape and he took his time," the police report says.

When interviewed, police said he called the incident a "terrible misunderstanding."

This from the Metro News Daily

A motion to dismiss the case filed by Hallowell’s lawyer, Bill Crowe, on Aug. 28, shows a statement from the victim that she no longer believes Hallowell should be prosecuted. The statement, included in Crowe’s motion, reads in part:

“As time has passed and upon further reflection, I may have misconstrued Dr. Hallowell’s intention, as he did nothing beyond the initial contact. I do not wish Dr. Hallowell to be prosecuted or disciplined as a result of this incident.”

The motion also alleges that an admission that Hallowell was exonerated on similar charges in the past that was included in a police interview with Hallowell were inaccurate. According to the police report, Hallowell said he had faced similar accusations in the past but was exonerated on a “misunderstanding.” Previously, Crowe said the accusations referenced one incident from more than 20 years ago that “did not involve contact of any kind.”

The police report also said Hallowell did not dispute the victim’s claims that he touched her but said any inappropriate contact was “inadvertent.”

Back to the video. This highlights how we, as consumers, rarely question the ethics of diagnosing. It's worrisome, more so because today the Royal College of Psychiatrists announced that their Vice-Chair, Dr Jon Godlin, was in talks at 10 Downing Street to discuss how new teachers will be trained to spot mental health issues in their pupils.

If this video is anything to go by then you'll see how the future of our children is in the hands of nothing more than a stage act, an illusion, a magic show with potentially dire consequences.

Please watch and spread far and wide.



Bob Fiddaman




Thursday, May 10, 2018

We Speak For The Dead To Protect The Industry




In 2015 an amendment to the Coroners' Bill was put forward in Ireland on behalf of John and Stephanie McGill Lynch. Their 14-year-old son, Jake (pictured), died after experiencing critical ADR's caused by the SSRI drug Prozac.

Currently, coroners can return an "open verdict" in such deaths. The open verdict means the jury confirms the death is suspicious but sidesteps a definitive verdict. Mr. and Mrs. Lynch wanted this amended to include a new verdict. They proposed the term “iatrogenic suicide” which, in a nutshell, means “the ending of one’s own life where the effect of medical treatment undertaken by the deceased, including any prescribed medication, is the primary cause of such an action."

Yesterday the Irish Times reported on the outcome of Jake’s Amendment.

Minster for Justice Charlie Flanagan ruled out the introduction citing that:
“The proposal from the McGill Lynch family is well-intentioned but cannot be supported. This is mainly because the verdict would apportion some liability on the medical practitioner who may have prescribed the treatment or medication for the deceased person”
I find Flanagan's ruling bizarre and I'm not alone in this assessment. Sinn Féin Senator, Pádraig MacLochlainn, who presented Jake’s Amendment on behalf of the McGill-Lynch family, said it was originally “uncontentious” among all parties in the Seanad but was blocked at the “11th hour.” “My suspicion is that senior medical professionals spooked the minister.”

MacLochlainn makes a valid point. Adding more insult to injury, the Office of the Attorney General advised the proposed verdict would be legally unsound because a new verdict would be capable of ascribing criminal liability to person or persons who are readily identifiable. Unsurprisingly, the Coroners Society of Ireland was opposed to the proposal. It seems the only people the government wants to hold accountable for these avoidable deaths is the victim who died.

The current choice of verdicts open to a coroner or, in legal cases, to a jury, include accidental death; misadventure; suicide; open verdict; natural causes, and; unlawful killing. When a person dies from self-sustained injury, mainstream terminology still labels such deaths as "suicides" despite that many pharma products can and do cause unwanted, ego-dystonic death. Ego-dystonic deaths are "against one's will." That is, if the consumer was not experiencing ADRs caused by pharma products, they would not in their normal undrugged mind, have wanted to die nor died.

Like thousands of other ADR victims, Jake's young mind was chemically abducted by Prozac. Prozac and all SSRIs cause akathisia, psychosis and suicidal thoughts and actions among many unsuspecting consumers. In the US, all SSRIs carry the FDA's most serious Black Box warning stating they can cause life-threatening ADRs. The FDA was forced to include the Black Box warning on SSRIs after thousands of reported deaths and extensive testimony by courageous family members left behind. Unfortunately, the FDA essentially buries the dire warning in tiny print tucked inside a paper envelope most trusting consumers unintentionally discard.

Justice Charlie Flanagan's ruling seems absurd as does his reasoning. Ms. Lynch told the Irish Times she and her husband, from Clondalkin, west Dublin, were “absolutely disgusted, traumatized,” adding that the proposed amendment “would have said ‘without apportioning blame.'" We are not looking for anyone’s head on a plate. But we are looking for some kind of accountability.”

Coroners are first and foremost doctors who sit on the fence regarding prescription drug-induced deaths. Coroners know they can't definitively label any of these deaths "suicides" but they won't protect the public by acknowledging lethal drug effects. If coroners did so, they would then honestly speak for the dead to protect the living. As it stands, coroners continue to deceitfully "speak for the dead" to protect fellow doctors and the drug industry.

The Irish Times article can be read in its entirety here.


Bob Fiddaman

Backstory

Prozac Took My Child (Guest Post)

Related Website

AntiDepAware ~ Inquest Reports









Wednesday, May 18, 2016

The Homicide Files: Prozac Prescripticide





This is the fifth in the series of the homicide files. My attention was to throw light on the homicide cases that have been reported to the FDA where the antidepressant, Prozac (fluoxetine) has been associated.

As you will see from the reports, the FDA have redacted all the vital information, particularly where the reported homicide was carried out by a child or person under the age of 25.

Prozac is marketed and manufactured by Eli Lilly.

An FDA advisory panel was convened in 1991 to review the fluoxetine data. It concluded that fluoxetine was safe despite the concerns raised by David Graham and others, leading critics to point out that several of the panellists had financial ties to Eli Lilly. (Source)


Adverse event reports regarding psychiatric drugs don't scare me. Suppressing them does.

Here's what the FDA sent investigative reporter, Andrew Thibault.


AERS Case Number 5749577

This case concerns a 10 year-old boy - The FDA, who were sent the information by Eli Lilly, have redacted all of the information. Ask yourself why they would do this? (Click on images to enlarge)




--

AERS Case Number 5781644

This case concerns a 16 year-old boy - The FDA, who were sent the information by Eli Lilly, have redacted all of the information. Death was the adverse event being reported, although we don't know if it was a homicide or suicide. The 16 year-old boy was on 60mg of Prozac per day.



--

AERS Case Number 6328428

18 year-old male, prescribed 10mg Prozac daily. 



--

AERS Case Number 6526177

15 year-old boy. Homicide, Physical assault and withdrawal "syndrome"




--

AERS Case Number 7979016

16 year-old boy, prescribed Prozac "off label" - he went on to carry out a homicide. He first attempted suicide, this failed - he later went on to stab to death an unknown male/female. Interestingly, his psychiatrist assessed the homicide, self injurious behaviour and manic symptoms as being related to Prozac use. The report mentions that Health Canada were involved in putting the information together which would suggest that the 16 year-old boy was living in Canada.



--

AERS Case Number 8255398

27 year-old male. Killed his wife then himself. 



--



So, there you have it. Prozac, it seems, is the one antidepressant that the FDA seem to be tight lipped about. Not surprising given that in 1991 several of the FDA panellists had financial ties to Eli Lilly. They concluded that Prozac was safe.


Bob Fiddaman



Previously in the Homicide Files series.





**Prescripticide is defined as a death that is caused by an adverse reaction to a prescription drug.







Monday, May 16, 2016

The Homicide Files: Cymbalta







Following on from my previous two posts (Paxil Homicide Celexa & Lexapro Homicide) I now turn my attention to Cymbalta (Duloxetine)

Cymbalta is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and is notoriously difficult to withdraw from due to it being a capsule filled with tiny beads.

These series of posts are a result of a recent Freedom of Information request made by Andrew Thibault to the American drug regulator, the FDA. Information sent to Thibault is now publicly available ~ I've been sifting through some of the documents.


AERS Case Number 6060757

Homicide by female (age 26) The patient was taking Cymbalta (60mg per day) beginning sometime in 2005. She shot and killed her husband. (Click on images to enlarge)



--

AERS Case Number 6273800

Homicide by male (age 84) The patient was taking Cymbalta (40mg per day) between May 2005 - March 2007.

The report shows us that his prescribing physician does not attribute that Cymbalta may have played a part in this homicide. One has to question if this statement was based on scientific fact or just, as I suspect, an assumption. The 84 year-old shot his wife then himself.



--


AERS Case Number 7406308

Homicide by male (age 55) The patient was taking Cymbalta (30mg per day) between April 2,  2010 - May 16,  2010.

Patient shot his wife dead then tried to kill himself. His family members reported that there were no domestic or family conflicts and that nobody could explain what happened.




--

AERS Case Number 7730741


Homicide by male (age 15) The patient was taking Cymbalta (30mg per day) for just 13 days before carrying out homicide.

The key points to this murder have been redacted by the FDA in efforts not to identify the 15 year-old male. It does say, however that he shot and killed more than one person.

It was also reported that over the 13 day period when he was taking Cymbalta he suffered hypomania, including agitation, psychic activation (whatever that is?), periods of euphoria and akathesia (feeling of  inner restlessness)



--

AERS Case Number 7762506

Homicide by male (age 42) The patient was taking Cymbalta (unknown dose) he was also being treated with Prozac. Ironically both medications are made by the same company, Eli Lilly.

The report shows how Prozac made him a "happy manic" while Cymbalta would make him "depressed"

The patient killed a person or persons. Some time after this event his wife gave birth but the child died some days after being born. Makes you wonder his his wife was also taking psychiatric medication and if her child died as a result of her taking medication. In essence, this could be a double homicide both caused by medication, prescripticide*, if you will.




--

AERS Case Number 5924658

Homicide by female (age 62) The patient was taking Cymbalta (unknown dose) between an unspecified time.

The 62 year-old female had no history of suicidal thoughts.

This report is interesting in as much that the FDA have redacted the actual time where she is reported to have experience suicidal thoughts. Why have they done this? 

She shot her husband in the arm and he bled to death. Eli Lilly, who filed the report to the FDA have added that "It was unclear if this was accidental or not"- Hmm.








Bob Fiddaman.


*Prescripticide ~  is defined as a death that is caused by an adverse reaction to a prescription drug.

Previously in this Homicide series...



Database available on Murder Meds.



Thursday, February 04, 2016

Prozac: Uncharted Down Syndrome Territory








The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center have announced new research and planning to see if Prozac (fluoxetine) can improve brain development, intellectual functioning, and behavior of children with Down Syndrome (DS) when given prenatally and postnatally during the first 2 years of life.

According to a breakdown of the study, found here, pregnant women and their unborn child will be assigned randomly to receive either fluoxetine or placebo in the study. Participants will have a 2 in 3 chance of receiving fluoxetine or placebo.


The study suggests...

During the prenatal study period, participants will take their assigned medication orally. After her child is born, the mother will stop taking the oral tablet of her assigned medication and her child will start a liquid solution of the medication to be taken orally. After birth, the fluoxetine dose will be adjusted as needed.

This, as far as I am aware, is a first as the ingestion of antidepressants by pregnant mothers has never been studied in a clinical trial before because, to date, it has always been deemed unethical. It throws up debate, much of it centered around antidepressants and the birth defect link, although this study's aim is not to prove whether or not antidepressant use in pregnancy can harm the fetus.

Very little has been mentioned in the press about this study save for a spattering here and there citing a study in mice whereby it was shown that mice with the extra copy of Down syndrome genes (like humans with DS), apparently improved the disturbed processes of brain development/function when treated with Prozac.

It's a tricky area as the target subject in this new study are both pregnant mothers and fetuses that have already been deemed to be carrying DS genes. Any help DS children can get in life should be applauded but is it right to put them at risk?

Half of the funds for the study have been raised by father, Paul Watson, who heard about the success of the studies in mice. Paul's son was born with Down syndrome.

Here's NBC reporting on the study... (If video does not load then it can be viewed here)




For years Prozac has been cited as one of the more safer SSRis on the market, in the UK, for example, it can still be prescribed to minors legally, the only SSRi that, apparently, does not show evidence of inducing suicidal thoughts in children and teenagers taking it. Surprisingly, the American drug regulator, the FDA, feel that Prozac should, just like the other SSRis on the market, carry a black box warning listing the dangers of its use in children and adolescents. As with all SSRis Prozac has never been deemed safe to give to pregnant mothers, that decision is left to both treating physician and the mother.

This study bothers me somewhat. Who has made this decision whereby it is now deemed ethical to study an antidepressant in a living fetus, end of the day a fetus with the down syndrome gene has just as much right to life as a "normal, healthy" human fetus.

Why has this study been given the green light, moreover, isn't this merely a guinea pig trial using a drug that can potentially cause more harm to the fetus on someone (the fetus) who has no say in the matter?

The study's lead author, Dr. Carol Tamminga, said, "the medical community has been giving Prozac to children with Down syndrome for years, but the effects of giving it to children in utero haven’t been tested." She added, "and this will really be the first controlled trial where we will get to test does this really work or not."

Tamminga's biography page shows that she has served as a Member and Chair of the Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee of the FDA. However, there is no mention of the payments made to her by Prozac manufacturers, Eli Lilly.

Jan. to Dec. 2011 - $1,574 for Business travel and other value.

Jan. to Dec. 2013 - $466 for Business travel and other value.

Jan. to Dec. 2013 - $267 for  Business Meals.

Tamminga has also received research support from Sunovion and travel funds from Autiphony Therapeutics and has served as a consultant for Astellas, Kaye Scholer LLC for Pfizer, and Lundbeck.

According to Drugwatch it is estimated that thousands of people have filed Prozac lawsuits citing a variety of adverse events including mental, emotional and physical suffering. Early cases have claimed that Prozac has caused an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and violent behaviour. Drugwatch also claims that by the year 2000 Prozac manufacturer, Eli Lilly had reportedly paid out more than $50 million to settle more than 30 Prozac lawsuits related to murders or suicides.

Drugwatch also claims that Prozac has been linked with birth defects, including anencephaly, a fatal defect in the neural tube. Newborns also can experience septal defects, damaged hearts or cleft lip or palate.

Yet here we are in 2016 putting this powerful SSRi into the bodies of pregnant mothers who are carrying a fetus with DS genes. Furthermore, here we are in 2016 giving a newborn baby from the age of 0-2 years the liquid formulation of Prozac.

Background of the study can be read here. Results are expected to be available within 12 to 18 months.

I do hope all the participants are given all the information about Prozac, including the information about the $50 million paid out in Prozac lawsuits related to murders or suicides and also Prozac's link to birth defects.

I honestly don't know what to say anymore.

Bob Fiddaman.


Related

Prozac Took My Child (Guest Post)

Open Verdict Returned in Prozac Related Death














Saturday, October 17, 2015

Open Verdict Returned in Prozac Related Death








It's not often one comes across a coroner who goes against the grain.

It's not often coroners come up against surviving family members armed with knowledge about drugs used to treat apparent mental illnesses.

Yesterday, at Dublin Coroner’s Court, Coroner Dr Brian Farrell ruled against suicide as being the cause of Jake McGill Lynch's death on 20 March, 2013.

Jake was just 14 years-old when he took a .22 rifle and placed it in his mouth and pulled the trigger. One year previously he had been diagnosed with Aspergers and, after a 15 minute consultation with psychiatrist,Dr Maria Migone, he was prescribed Prozac (fluoxetine) and was told that it would help him get through his exams at school - something that Jake had been worrying over.

Six days after starting his medication, Jake walked out of his first exam halfway through - later that night he cried for three hours. A day later his Prozac dose was doubled,

On day 46, Jake killed himself.

During the 18 month long inquest evidence showed that there were links to Prozac and suicide related deaths, in particular the black box warning on Prozac in the US. No such black box warning exists in either the UK or Ireland (Jake's place of birth)

In fact some years ago after meeting with the Irish Medicines Board (the equivalent of the FDA and MHRA) Jake's parents were told that, "nobody would take Prozac if such a black box warning was put into place."

Some informed consent that is, huh?

So, what is an open verdict?

In a nutshell it means that there is insufficient evidence that somebody had intended to kill themselves. In other words, Jake may not have intended to kill himself were it not for a third party, that party being Prozac.

The coroner's verdict is kinda vague in as much that he cannot say for certain why Jake did what he did but with Prozac on the table one only has to read between the lines. It leaves open the question as to whether or not Prozac induced Jake's death.

One fifth of adolescents experience suicidal thoughts, according to Dr Houlihan, a consultant Paediatric Psychiatrist at Temple Street Children’s Hospital.

Yesterday's open verdict was welcomed by Jake's parents, Steffini McGill Lynch and John Lynch from Clondalkin.

“It’s a huge relief. It allows us to grieve now. You can’t let go of that night but this allows another chapter to close. This is the verdict he deserved because in our eyes it was drug induced,” Steffini said after the inquest concluded.

One thing is certain. Jake should never have been prescribed Prozac for 'exam jitters'. He was a normal child made to feel abnormal the minute he walked into his psychiatrist's office. He was a child, who through no fault of his own, that had to deal with two things.

1. The worry of pending exams.

2. The chemical imbalance caused by the Prozac he was prescribed.

Earlier this year "Jake's Amendment" was tabled in the Dail of the Coroner's Amendment Bill 2015, a bill that calls for coroners to widen the scope so they are able to deliver a finding of Iatrogenic Suicide. Iatrogenic Suicide is the ending of one's own life where the effect of medical treatment undertaken by the deceased, including any prescribed medication.

Although no such verdict was delivered yesterday, the open verdict certainly points to the fact that Jake did not intend to kill himself - something pushed him. You'd have to be from the plant Zog to rule out Prozac.

Eli Lilly, who market and manufacture Prozac, have placed the following warning on the package insert for Prozac in the United States.

"Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Monitor for clinical worsening and suicidal thinking and behavior."

The Irish Medicines Board should follow suit. I doubt if they will. The whole medicine regulatory system is run by limp-wristed buffoons who, it appears, merely shrug their shoulders when people die as a result of medications they have granted licence to.

Jake's voice has been heard. Hopefully the pro-antidepressant brigade in Ireland will cease writing column inches in the Irish media bigging up the use of these types of medications in children and young adults - I doubt that will happen too. Psychiatrists who write for the national press are, in my opinion, egotistical and bear all the hallmarks of narcissism. 

Godspeed little man.


Bob Fiddaman.





Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Lilly's Cymbalta Expert








Late last week a jury ruled that Eli Lilly and Co. isn’t liable for withdrawal symptoms including brain zaps experienced by a woman, Claudia Herrera, after she quit the antidepressant Cymbalta.

The crux of the argument, it seems, was that Lilly faced claims of not disclosing, on the warning label for Cymbalta, that 44% of users, in its own studies, suffered discontinuation side effects. Instead, plaintiff lawyers argued, Cymbalta’s label initially disclosed that 2% or more experienced certain side effects.

Lilly's legal team hit back suggesting that  the 44% figure wasn’t relevant to prescribers because, in the same studies, 22% of subjects discontinuing a placebo also reported side effects. The label discloses the Cymbalta withdrawal side effects that occurred significantly more frequently than those of people who took a sugar pill.

Obviously, both sides would need more evidence to provide to a jury. Lilly's expert. it appears, may have tipped the balance.

Douglas Jacobs, a psychiatrist, told jurors there’s no evidence in the medical literature of withdrawal symptoms lasting for months. Herrera’s symptoms might have been a manifestation of her underlying depression and anxiety disorders,

It's classic pharma defence, blame the "illness" and not the drug. So exactly who is Lilly's expert, Douglas Jacobs? Well, he and Eli Lilly go way back.

In 1991, Jacobs' brainchild, "National Depression Screening Day" was launched throughout America/ Two years later, in 1993, it was learned that "National Depression Screening Day" were funded by a number of organisations. The year 1993 saw them receive around $300,000 to $400,000." About half of that came from Eli Lilly Co (1)

Human rights organisation, the CCHR, wrote extensively about Jacobs ties with Lilly here. The article, entitled, "SIGNS OF SUICIDE – A MENTAL HEALTH QUIZ THAT FAILS", highlights how The Signs of Suicide® Prevention Program was produced and sold to schools by a non-profit organization called Screening for Mental Health. (SMH)

Founder and Director of SMH was... you've guessed it, Dr. Douglas Jacobs.

Here he is (below) receiving a cheque on behalf of SMH. The cheque of $500,000 was presented to Jacobs by Bob Pitsal of... you've guessed it, Eli Lilly.



In fact, from 1996 to 2008, Eli Lilly handed over a staggering  $3,920,425.00 to SMH. (2)

Further reading about Lilly's connections with National Depression Screening Day can be found here.


More recently, Jacobs has been in the news for controversial statements made in regard to Daniel Marsh.

Marsh was just 15 when he broke into the home of an elderly couple and brutally stabbed them to death.

Three years previously Daniel Marsh, who at that time was just 12, was honored by a local American Red Cross chapter for saving his father’s life when the elder Marsh suffered a heart attack behind the wheel of the family’s car.

So, what could change a seemingly thoughtful caring 12 year-old into a sadistic killer just three years later?

On day 7 of the trial of Daniel Marsh it emerged that he was on a number of psychiatric medications. This, from Charmayne Schmitz (3)

Wellbutrin was added to Daniel’s existing medications with the first visit to Dr. He on January 30, 2013, and was started at 50 mg. On the second visit, February 12, 2013, it was increased to 100 mg. This was after Daniel’s mother told the doctor that Daniel was attending school daily, eating properly and had no problems with the additional medication. It was noted in the file that the medication may be increased later to 150 mg. On February 27, the mother called and asked that the medication be increased to 150 mg.
Daniel was seen by Dr. He again on March 14, 2013. Daniel’s mood and anxiety were noted as improved, but he was still depressed, and somehow anxious about his friends. As on the initial visit, he answered, “No,” to Dr. He’s questions about having homicidal/suicidal feelings or tendencies. The doctor’s summary was that he “tolerates” the medication.
On April 16, 2013, the next office visit, Daniel appeared more depressed and anxious. Daniel told the doctor that he had become angry and kicked the family dog. His mother said he had stopped taking the Seroquel that had been prescribed since December of 2012 because he didn’t like how it made him feel. It was noted that he was in the severe clinical range. The Zoloft, also being prescribed since December, was increased to 150 mg at that time.
By telephone on May 1, 2013, Daniel’s mother reported that Daniel was in crisis. He refused to restart the Seroquel and she requested different medications to calm him down. Abilify was prescribed. Lab tests were ordered because Dr. He wanted to know what triggered the crisis. The tests came back positive for marijuana.
The next office visit was on May 30. Daniel showed signs of severe depression, anxiety, muscle tension and anger. The Wellbutrin was increased to 300 mg. Daniel had been recently suspended for bringing a pocket knife to school. Daniel’s mother reported that he would only take the Abilify as needed, when he had extreme anxiety, not as prescribed on a daily basis. This was the last time Dr. He saw Daniel.

Jacobs, who was an expert for the prosecution in the Marsh trial,  was adamant that drugs and doctors could not be blamed for Daniel’s violent acts, in fact Jacobs, who was paid $15,000 to review the medical records of Daniel Marsh and testify about his findings, was later cross-examined by Deputy Public Defender Ron Johnson.

Once again, Charmayne Schmitz covered the story (4)

Dr. Jacobs was disciplined once for failure to diagnose in a suicide case. He charged half his fee despite the discipline. Johnson read the finding: “Dr. Jacob’s opinion was naïve and not with common sense,” from the State Board of Maryland. Dr. Jacobs claimed that he never read their finding.
Johnson then raised the issue that Dr. Jacobs was paid by a drug company, Roche, about $30,000 to $40,000 in 1998. He also testified at a Congressional Hearing in 2000 for Roche, about a relationship between the drug Accutane and suicidal tendencies. Afterwards, the FDA issued a black box warning for Accutane. Dr. Jacobs also worked on two other cases of wrongful death for Roche.
Eli Lilly and Company was one of the contributors to his non-profit. Lilly makes Prozac. Up to 200,000 people were screened by the program. 60% of those would have possibly seen a physician, so Lilly stood to gain 120,000 patients.
Zoloft is not approved for pediatric patients, except for OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder). This is stated in the black box warning. Jacobs said in clinical trials children have a high placebo response. So, there is no stated evidence that Zoloft works for pediatric patients. When questioned, Jacobs said the clinical experience has shown it to be beneficial.
Dr. Jacobs said there isn’t a lower dosage of Wellbutrin for a 15-year-old. It would be the same as for an adult.
Johnson raised the issue of the medical guide again. It mentions anger, violence and aggression. The doctor treating Daniel “made a clinical judgment.” Daniel was asked about these symptoms and said he had none. Daniel did tell the therapist, but he wasn’t explicit.
Trials of drugs are usually 16 weeks. There are no trials for combinations of drugs. The only evidence is from case reports. The case reports are not evidence of causation unless the FDA gets a large number of them. The doctor then dismissed a case study mentioned by Johnson from a medical journal, stating that “young kids have violent thoughts” on Prozac. The doctor said there weren’t a lot of them reported.


Daniel Marsh was sentenced to 52 years to life.


Hardly surprising then that months later Jacobs is once again in court giving evidence regarding another antidepressant, this time Eli Lilly's Cymbalta, where he told the jury that "there is no evidence of withdrawal symptoms lasting for months." Adding that, "Herrera’s symptoms might have been a manifestation of her underlying depression and anxiety disorders."

It leaves me wondering if the Jury in the Cymbalta lawsuit were made aware of Lilly's expert witness.

Google "eli lilly douglas jacobs" and see what it throws up.

A similar case to that of Herrera's is set for trial in California later today.



Bob Fiddaman.



(1) 1,300 Sites Nationwide To Test For Depression - October 05, 1993
(2) Signs of Suicide – A Mental Health Quiz That Fails - Citizens Commission on Human Rights
(3) Testimony by Marsh Psychiatrist – Part Two - Charmayne Schmitz 
(4) Harvard Psychiatrist Puts Blame on Patient and Family - Charmayne Schmitz 








Monday, August 03, 2015

C-Day for Eli Lilly






I do love it when pharmaceutical companies enter into trials (litigation) in the small hope that they can persuade judges to toss cases on points of law.

Litigation fascinates me and it's something that has been very much part of my reading materiel over the past few years or so. I should have studied law, I guess it's never too late - sadly I have the memory of a sieve and don't think I could soak and retain any information given to me... and then sit a bar exam. So, it's just a hobby of mine to read through court transcripts and depositions.

There are many stages of litigation before it actually gets into court. In the main, both sides try and strike a deal that will suit both parties, those making the claim and those defending the claim. Pharmaceutical attorneys are in the business of saving their clients money so they will do pretty much everything in their power to make it difficult for plaintiffs. America is different to the UK in the respect that Pharmaceutical companies, when facing group actions (class-action lawsuits) try to consolidate them all so they are heard in a specific state, a state that may have a different set of rules (laws) than any other state, a state that normally gives them a better chance of success (due to favourable laws)

Pharmaceutical attorneys also apply for "Summary Judgement". In a nutshell this means that they apply to a judge and ask him to strike the cases against them because, "they will argue that no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in a complaint can be decided upon certain facts without trial."


One recent motion for "Summary Judgement" came in the cases Herrera v. Eli Lilly and Company (case no. 2:13-cv-2702-SVW-MAN) and Hexum v. Eli Lilly and Company (case no. 2:13-cv-2701-SVW-MAN)

Eli Lilly and Company are defending cases brought against them regarding their antidepressant, Cymbalta. The crux of the claim is that Lilly failed to adequately warn the plaintiffs and their physicians of Cymbalta’s true withdrawal risks. Lilly filed a motion for "Summary Judgement" and the judge (Judge Stephen V. Wilson, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles) denied them this motion. Now, Lilly go to trial to face the allegations and, more than likely, they will use points of law throughout the trial, or rather they will exhaust every single avenue to try and get the cases dismissed. If this doesn't show the average person how guilty they are then I don't know what will.

The beauty of this trial is that Lilly are up against a formidable team in Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman. The Los Angeles based law firm have quite a history when going up against pharmaceutical companies. They, along with three other law firms are representing over 2,000 plaintiffs who allege they have suffered injury, and in some cases, death, due to symptoms suffered while attempting to discontinue Cymbalta.

Cymbalta has been prescribed widely and there have been many reports of severe withdrawal reactions to it. Lilly, just like other antidepressant manufacturers, chose to either ignore these reports or, as the case may be, play down the reactions, ie; blame the illness rather than the product. It's a classic stance of the pharmaceutical industry and, it has to be said, a classic stance of those who regulate prescription medications (FDA). You can judge for yourselves if you think it's difficult to taper from Cymbalta, here.

These cases are ones that I shall be keeping tabs on. The first starts Tuesday Aug. 4 in Los Angeles.

Oh to be living in California right now. I'd pretty much drop everything to be present at trial, I'd pretty much like to see Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman in action and Lilly attorneys too.

I like a flutter now and again - I'm betting that Lilly will, at some point during these series of group actions, cave in and settle. First though, they must try to find legal loopholes to avoid paying out millions of dollars, those dollars being the profit they have made on Cymbalta. Profit that came about due to their failure to warn against the horrific withdrawal reactions many have had to endure.

Let's get these items of disclosure out into the public domain, let's see how Lilly played down the risk.

Yup, I do love it when Pharmaceutical companies refuse to offer settlement. It makes blogging such a pleasure and enlightens and educates me.

Sad, I know but, hey-ho, some folks like to knit, some like to go to the gym.

I like to read and disseminate information regarding the dangers of these drugs and the way that pharmaceutical companies, such as Lilly, hold back information from the public purely to keep their pockets bulging and to keep their shareholders happy.

More coming soon.


Bob Fiddaman.






Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Jake's Amendment






An amendment to to the Coroners Bill is being put forward in Ireland later this week on behalf of a Stephanie McGill Lynch who believes her 14 year-old son, Jake (pictured) took his own life as a result of induced psychosis caused by the controversial antidepressant Prozac.

Stephanie, who wrote a guest post on my blog back in May, is hoping that 'Jake's amendment', which she drafted, will give coroners the option of a returning a verdict of  'Iatrogenic suicide'  or 'medically induced' suicide. As it stands, Coroners can return an 'open verdict'. The verdict means that the jury confirms that the death is suspicious but is unable to reach any of the other verdicts open to them.

This amendment will, no doubt, face opposition from pharmaceutical companies, particularly those who market and manufacture antidepressants. No doubt too, leading psychiatrists will have something to say about the amendment, probably along the lines of "the amendment may stop patients taking their medication."

Um, yup, isn't that the whole point?

Pharmaceutical companies and psychiatrists work hand-in-hand and any attempt at undermining them is usually met with stiff opposition

I think this is a brave move and, if implemented, could release the ball and chain currently around the necks of Coroners. They, just like medicine regulators, have a duty to protect the public from unsafe drugs, they also have a duty to give the dead a voice in the hope that that 'voice' may save other lives.

My hat is off to Stephanie on this - it's a bold move and one that will cause eruptions within the field of the pro-antidepressant brigade.

The amendment is being presented to the Dáil, on behalf of Stephanie, by SinnFein's Padraig Mac Lochlainn.

Fingers crossed that common sense prevails.


Bob Fiddaman.







Saturday, June 20, 2015

A Brilliant Piece of Investigative Journalism






I urge you all to share this far and wide. It's a documentary that was recently aired in Ireland. It will make you sad, it will make you angry. Hopefully it will make you realize that the pharmaceutical companies who feature in this documentary need to be held accountable for the heinous acts they have committed by allowing antidepressants on to the market when they knew all along that they could cause some people to carry out crimes of violence on others.

The FDA and MHRA should also watch. Then, hang their heads in shame.




Bob Fiddaman

Thursday, May 07, 2015

Cymbalta - Australian Doctor's Warned






A subscription only based website aimed at Australian healthcare professionals is reporting that doctors in Australia are being urged to prescribe Eli Lilly's antidepressant Cymbalta (duloxetine) with caution after a 35-year-old Victorian truck driver died of serotonin syndrome from a dose increase.

Nicholas Moorby died in April 2013, four months after his GP increased his Cymbalta dose from the recommended maximum daily dose of 120mg (three 60 mg capsules) to 240mg/4 capsules per day.

According to the Australian Doctor website, "friends of Mr Moorby noticed he was "agitated", "really out of it", "blabbering" and "making no sense" in the days leading up to his death."

Moorby's GP, who increased the dose, admitted that he had made an "error of judgement" and did not face any criminal charges over the death.

This from the Australian Doctor:

His GP was told by Mr Moorby that his psychiatrist recommended the dose increase due to his severe depression. The unnamed GP told the told the Coroners Court of Victoria last month,“Unfortunately, a lot of the specialists nowadays do not write scripts, they would tell the patient, go and see your GP and get the GP to write them. There are many cases where specialists prescribe big doses of anti-depressive so while I go to one or two tablets it’s not unusual for specialists to go to four, so I did not question him on that,” 

Moorby had amphetamine, methamphetamine, duloxetine, oxycodone, promethazine and alcohol in his system when he died. However, Forensic pathologist, Dr Heinrich Bouwer, told the court that an adverse drug reaction to excessive duloxetine could occur with or without the interaction of amphetamines.

The Australian medicines regulator, The Therapeutic Goods Administration, recorded 21 cases of serotonin syndrome due to duloxetine in their Dec 2013 report.

For those that don't know, serotonin syndrome, also known as serotonin toxicity, is a  life threatening drug reaction that causes the body to have too much serotonin. This leads to excessive stimulation of the central nervous system and peripheral serotonin receptors.

When you take poor metabolizers into account and you see what the friends of Nicholas Moorby said... he was "agitated", "really out of it", "blabbering" and "making no sense"  - there really is a strong argument that these drugs can induce suicide and homicidal acts. Alas, the pharmaceutical companies and the blinkered views of psychiatrists often blame the "underlying illness" for the cause of suicide and/or homicide.

In the United States Eli Lilly and Company are facing a number of lawsuits regarding Cymbalta.

Over 20 lawsuits have been filed in federal courts across the US which sees claims that Lilly deliberately omitted information about the true risk of withdrawal in the product label and in marketing materials.

More information about those lawsuits can be found on the Baum, Hedlund, Aristei & Goldman, P.C here.


Bob Fiddaman.





Sunday, May 03, 2015

Prozac Took My Child (Guest Post)






The following is a guest post. It was sent to me by Stephanie Lynch, the mother of Jake McGill Lynch who, at the age of 14, took a .22 rifle, placed it in his mouth and pulled the trigger. Jake, at the time, was on a course of medication, the controversial selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRi), Prozac.

I have much to say regarding Stephanie's guest post. My thoughts follow her heartbreaking story.



Prozac Took My Child

On May 2 we should have celebrated our beautiful child's 17th birthday, instead we got to place flowers and balloons on his grave.

Jake McGill Lynch was 14 years old when he took a .22 rifle and placed it in his mouth and pulled the trigger, all the while his dad and I sat downstairs unaware there was a problem.

You see this was not unusual when you are members of a gun club, what was unusual, and is now unfixable, is that Jake took his own life that night. This young child did not suffer from any suicide ideation, nor did he suffer from depression, psychosis, heightened anxiety or any other label that psychiatrists like to place on normal children who are facing exams and going through hormone changes at the same time.


Jake (14) Photo taken two months prior to his death.


Jake had a diagnosis of aspergers syndrome, it was so mild that it went undetected until he was 12. We all have anxiety in life, but when you have aspergers you worry about things you shouldn't worry about. So we, as loving parents, wanted to make Jake's transition from a teenager to a young man as easy as possible so we took advice from a school counsellor to have Jake assessed, wow, did we ever get that wrong!

Jake attended our GP first, who saw no problems, he then went to a psychologist were he would visit once a month, sometimes it went 3-4 months without a visit, I thought he could tell her things he did not feel he could tell us without being embarrassed. She then, in her wisdom, decided to refer him to her colleague, a Psychiatrist, we did not know the difference between counselling and psychiatry back then.

Skip to his first meeting which his dad took him to. It lasted all of 10 maybe 15 minutes, they left with a prescription for a drug called Prozac. She said it would help him get through his exams.

Six days later Jake walked out of an exam halfway through and had his first meltdown that night, He cried for 3 hours..we thought it was the stress of the exams. (This was his 6th day on Prozac)

After 7 days his dosage was doubled without seeing his psychiatrist. When he did see her, two weeks later, I told her what happened, she said, "This will wear off after 3-4 weeks and that he (Jake) should continue on the Prozac."

His 46th day on Prozac saw him take his own life.

Now, she nor the pharmacist, or anybody else for that matter, ever showed us an information leaflet or told us the side effects, she has said since that she went through a suicide check list with Jake and he said 'no' to all the questions put to him by her.


"Nobody would take Prozac if such a black box warning was put into place." - Irish Medicines Board



In Ireland, where we live, Prozac, which I believe is responsible for so many deaths, does not carry a black box warning.

When we met with the Irish Medicines Board (IMB) and asked why there was no black box warning we were told that nobody would take Prozac if such a black box warning was put into place.

At no stage did I ever sign a consent form nor has the psychiatrist got one with my husband's signature on. In the meantime we are left with the aftermath of a child, who should be on the cusp of something wonderful in his life, now being buried 6ft under ground.

Why is nobody in the medical profession shocked or saddened that Jake is dead? Why do they tell so many lies afterwards? Why do they not want to stop the deaths of children? Why in God's name do they see fit to produce and prescribe a drug with side effects of suicide and self-harm, amongst hundreds of others to children? If they think this is okay then why is ecstasy, cocaine or LSD illegal, what is the difference? The side effects are all the same.

When Jake, towards the end, looked or acted in any way stressed, I, his mother, would ask did he take his medication, thinking his exams were stressing him and the Prozac would make it better. Little did I know, at the time, that it would kill him.

How, do we fix it? Well, we can't but what we can do is speak and fight for our child.

We as Jake's parents will never stop fighting for justice for Jake, no matter what the cost or time. I know the psychiatric profession hope I get bored and/or go away, I know Eli Lilly, who market and manufacture Prozac, hope I stop mentioning their drug. That's never going to happen! They, Eli Lilly and the treating psychiatrist are, I believe, both guilty and both carry Jake's blood on their hands for not informing us that this could happen.

Let's face it, what happened to Jake could happen to any family. We thought we were helping Jake, all we done by listening to the so called professionals, and I use that term lightly, is help kill Jake. This can never be fixed but this should be stopped. Anxiety is part and parcel of life, so is sadness, grief and relationship breakdowns, unemployment too. No tablet is ever going to fix any of the above, these are life circumstances not some made up disorder or a made up chemical imbalance.

If only we had been informed of the side effects I would not be writing this now because we would never have allowed Jake to have Prozac, what parent would?

If your child, or anybody you know, is a little anxious why in the world would you give them a drug with those side effects?

Jake's death was so preventable from start to finish, he was let down by all involved and I include us, his parents, in that statement. How stupid were we to listen to a "professional" when really nobody knows their child like a parent?

Shame on Eli Lilly, shame on the psychiatrist, shame on the IMB and Medical council, shame again on the coroners for not pointing out the dangers when all these inquests come before them.

We will have a voice for Jake, that I am certain of, it will never bring him back but everybody will know that our child was not at any time a depressed suicidal teenager, he was a normal child who died from a legal drug that induced self my son to kill himself.

Stephanie Lynch - Ireland.



My thoughts.

The story of Jake isn't isolated. Many parents who lose children to suicide often don't make the connection between an antidepressant induced suicide. Many coroners, who have a duty to give the dead a voice to protect the living, also rarely make the connection. In the case of the latter I believe it boils down to one of two things.

1. Coroners have a blind ignorance when it comes to making the connection between antidepressant induced suicide.

2. Coroners are aware of the link but choose not to publish their findings because they feel they may put people off taking their medication.

What strikes me as an odd statement in Stephanie's above post is the response of the Irish Medicine's Board regarding the black box warning.

"Nobody would take it if such a warning was put into place."

Isn't that the whole point?

When a land owner erects an electronic fence around his/her property he/she has a duty to warn that the fence is electric, ergo, do not touch it. He/she is warning you because you may die if you touch it. Shouldn't the same be said for Prozac? Exactly what is it that the Irish Medicine's Board are trying to say here?

I'm left scratching my head at this bizarre response from a regulator who are supposed to protect the public from unsafe drugs.

Stephanie blames herself for Jake's death, most parents, if not all who have lost a child to suicide, often do. I couldn't disagree more but do understand the guilt, obviously not through experience of losing a child to suicide because I'm fortunate to have all of my three children alive.

Jake was prescribed Prozac, a drug that has been given a clean bill of health by the Irish Medicine's Board and the British drug regulator, the MHRA. In both countries Prozac can be prescribed to children. Strangely, in the United States, Prozac is approved for use in children and adolescents for the treatment of major depressive disorder and for the treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. Jake had neither of these. He was just worried about his exams.

Moreover, Eli Lilly, who market and manufacture Prozac, have placed the following warning on the package insert for Prozac in the United States.

"Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Monitor for clinical worsening and suicidal thinking and behavior."

Clever marketing and deflecting of laying the blame individually on Prozac sees the manufacturer lump all antidepressants together when they write on the package insert the following message

"Increased risk of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults taking antidepressants."

You'll note that they don't mention their product by name in this statement.

Jake and his parents should have been told about the suicide link when he was prescribed Prozac. His inquest, which will be taking place shortly, should also go into the reasons why Jake or his parents were not warned in the same way that American children are.

A quick look on the MHRA website shows that there has been 111 reported suicides on Prozac - it's my belief that these figures should also be placed onto boxes or package inserts, consumers and parents have a right to know.

The Rxisk database, which gives more up to date figures and includes worldwide reports, shows that there has been 1,560 reported suicides on Prozac. Once again, I believe, that this information should be implemented into package inserts or, at the very least, relayed to patients or the parents of patients.

The system failed Jake, the whole system. The treating psychiatrist, the Irish Medicines Board, and Eli Lilly. Jake's parents put their trust in this system and their son paid the price of the incompetence of all of the above.

I do hope the coroner will, at the very least, ask questions on Jake's behalf... and also on behalf of any children who may in future years be labelled by some apparent mind expert who will, no doubt, prescribe these mind-altering, dangerous class of drugs. I also hope that the coroner returns a verdict of a drug induced suicide. Jake and his family deserve recognition that Prozac played a major role in Jake's death.

Worrying about school exams is not a brain disease. Prescribing mild altering drugs to children because they are worried about pending exams would, in my opinion, suggest that the prescriber has the brain disease.

Bob Fiddaman.





Please contact me if you would like a guest post considered for publication on my blog.