Zantac Lawsuit


Researching drug company and regulatory malfeasance for over 16 years
Humanist, humorist
Showing posts with label Wyeth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wyeth. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

The Homicide Files: Effexor







This is the fourth in the series of psychiatric drug medication possibly causing homicide (Precripticide)

Today sees Effexor in the spotlight.

Effexor (Venlafaxine ) is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and is an extremely difficult drug to wean off due to its short half-life.

Links to parts 1,2, and 3 of the homicide series can be seen at the foot of this post.



AERS Case Number 4140388

Homicide by male (age 36) The patient was taking Effexor (dose unknown) beginning sometime in 2005. He shot and killed an unnamed person. (Click on images to enlarge)

The patient is quoted is this report, sent to Medwatch from Effexor manufacturer, Wyeth.

"The patient told police he was mentally ill (mental disorder) and "maybe a demon possessed me". The patient also commented, "I should just kill myself". When asked what happened between him and the driver he replied, "Oh my God, I don't know, it's just a blur".




--

AERS Case Number 4194052

Homicide by male (age 18) The patient was taking Effexor XR (75mg daily - increased to 300mg daily) during the periods November 2001 - January 2003. He was diagnosed with mild depression and had spoken with his Dr about not being able to concentrate for his grades. He killed his best friend by poisoning.




--

AERS Case Number 5836784

Homicide by male (age 58) The patient was taking Effexor XR (75mg daily) beginning in July 2003. Just days later he shot his wife to death before killing himself. The patient had no history of violence.



--


AERS Case Number 9822105

Homicide by female (age 34) The patient was taking Effexor (Unknown dose) Unknown duration. The patient was admitted to a psychiatric unit and after Effexor treatment was said to be in a confused state. The report also states that she experienced a psychosis during which time she tried to drown REDACTED and strangled REDACTED. After the events took place the patient said she could not remember committing these crimes.

The report was sent to the FDA by Pfizer.



--


AERS Case Number 6236297

Homicide by male (Unknown age) The patient was taking Effexor (Unknown dose) Unknown duration. 

Effexor therapy began in 1994. The report shows how the patient went on a "killing spree" and even quotes the patient as saying, "before I went on Effexor I was a man of peace, non-violent.



--



Bob Fiddaman.


Previously in the Homicide Files series.







Thursday, May 02, 2013

Patient Information or Litigation Disclaimer?




I was browsing through some SSRi patient information leaflets [PILs] earlier and have come to the conclusion that the manufacturers warnings about this, that and the other are merely coded messages to the consumer.

Years ago, when SSRi's first hit the market, there were few warnings of side-effects. Sure, back then we had dizziness, nausea, sweating etc but that's standard for most, if not all, prescription medicines.

Today, after US litigation, patient reporting and, it has to be said, internet activism, the PILs take on a completely different look. They [the manufacturer] are telling us we can't sue because we were told.

It's almost as if pharmaceutical compliance departments had a eureka moment and turned really bad news into something that could be productive in the future. "Hey if we stick broad but vague warning labels on our drugs then we cover ourselves from future litigation... quick, get the number for that medical ghostwriting team we used back in 1998"

Let's take a look at Seroxat for example. [NHS Information]




Motion to dismiss

1. Some people who take Seroxat may find that it intensifies depression and suicidal feelings in the early stages of treatment. 
Very vague statement but one that would certainly be used by GlaxoSmithKline attorneys if they were ever faced with a lawsuit. "There is no case for your client as my client clearly stated in the patient information leaflet that Seroxat wasn't for everyone."

2. "If you are taking Seroxat, or you care for someone who is taking Seroxat, you need to look out for changes in behaviour that could be linked to self-harm or suicide.
"If you notice any of these changes or are worried about how Seroxat is affecting you or someone you care for, you should contact your prescriber, a mental health professional or NHS Direct as soon as possible."

Again, Glaxo attorneys could have a field day, "Your honour, we have reason to believe that the deceased did not contact their prescriber, yet my client clearly stated in the patient information leaflet for them to do so if they were feeling suicidal, therefore we argue that there is no merit in this case" 


 3. Seroxat is not suitable for everyone and some people should never use it.

"Your honour, if the deceased had killed themselves by touching an electrical fence despite there being a warning not to do so would my learned friends still be representing him in court?" 


4. Over time it is possible that Seroxat can become unsuitable for some people, or they may become unsuitable for it. If at any time it appears that Seroxat has become unsuitable, it is important that the prescriber is contacted immediately.

"Your honour, the plaintiff may have become, over time, unsuitable for our client's product, he may also have had an adverse reaction to my client's product. At no time, leading up to his attempted suicide, did he contact his prescriber despite the fact that my client had advised this in the patient information leaflet."


5. You should only take this medicine during pregnancy if your doctor thinks that you need it
"Your honour, whilst my client has every sympathy for the birth defects the child in this case was born with, it was not my client's fault. My client never prescribed Seroxat to this young mother, it was her doctor."

6. If you take this medicine during the late stages of pregnancy your baby may have some problems after birth

"Your honour, how many warnings did this mother need, was she illiterate, could she not read? My client refutes any responsibly with regard to the plaintiff's son being born with septal heart defects. In fact, my client believes that it should be the plaintiff who should be facing prosecution for acting irresponsibly."

 7. This medicine may decrease fertility in men.

"Your honour, he was warned."


8. Before you have your baby you should discuss breast-feeding with your doctor or midwife. They will help you decide what is best for you and your baby based on the benefits and risks associated with this medicine. You should only breast-feed your baby while taking this medicine on the advice of your doctor or midwife.

"Your honour, my client blames the plaintiff and both the doctor and midwife, they should have read the patient information leaflet."


Judge's summation - Sadly, it is with great regret that I am granting GlaxoSmithKline motion to dismiss on the grounds that they covered all bases for any future litigation by applying warnings to their patient information leaflet. I am, however, recommending that in future Glaxo elaborate on the warnings. My recommendations are underlined:


1. Some people, particularly those who are poor metabolizers, who take Seroxat may find that it intensifies depression and suicidal feelings in the early stages of treatment. GlaxoSmithKline nor your prescriber cannot tell you if you are a poor metabolizer so, in essence, by administering Seroxat you are playing solo Russian roulette.

2. If you are taking Seroxat, or you care for someone who is taking Seroxat, you need to look out for changes in behaviour that could be linked to self-harm or suicide. Changes such as an increase in depression, anxiety, an inability to sit still, a lack of empathy toward others, excruciating electric-like zaps in your head, horrific nightmares where the subject matter is death, homicide, suicide. Outbursts of anger, for no apparent reason, aimed at those you love. If you notice any of these changes or are worried about how Seroxat is affecting you or someone you care for, you should contact your prescriber, a mental health professional or NHS Direct as soon as possible. NHS Direct et al should then telephone a 24 hour hotline, manned by an independent body who have no financial ties to GlaxoSmithKline, and request a safe withdrawal protocol. The patient should be hospitalized, at GlaxoSmithKline's expense, and monitored at regular intervals. Any item of clothing that could be used as an instrument for suicide must also be removed. GlaxoSmithKline's CEO, Sir Andrew Witty, should be contacted, no matter what time of day or night it is. Sir Witty may then realise that bad things didn't just happen to patients under JP Garnier's watch, they are still happening and are not part of "an era". Sir Witty can sit with the patient while he/she experiences thoughts of self-harm and/or suicide. Because of the logistics and vast number of people who suffer these kind of adverse reactions to Seroxat it is recommended that Sir Witty handpicks a team of GlaxoSmithKline executives to be on emergency call to tend to the needs of Seroxat induced suicide victims.


3. Seroxat is not suitable for everyone and some people should never use it. Some people cannot excrete Seroxat from their system quicker than others. This means that they build up toxic levels of the drug, in fact these people are overdosing on Seroxat without actually knowing it. This simple fact should be made crystal clear in future patient information leaflets. Sir Witty and his handpicked team of executives should disseminate this information to the public by word of mouth. Alternatively  a full page advertisement can be used in popular mainstream newspapers to warn this vulnerable patient population. "Toxic levels of Seroxat may lead to self harm and suicidal thoughts" should also be added to the patient information leaflet.


4. Over time it is possible that Seroxat can become unsuitable for some people, particularly those who are poor metabolizers, or they may become unsuitable for it, particularly those who are poor metabolizers, If at any time it appears that Seroxat has become unsuitable, it is important that the prescriber is contacted immediately. The Prescriber should then contact GlaxoSmithKline to file an adverse reaction report. In turn GlaxoSmithKline should investigate the adverse reaction and report back to the prescriber with a causality assessment. This will then help the prescriber decide, in future consultations with patients, if Seroxat is the drug for them.

5. You should only take this medicine during pregnancy if your doctor thinks that you need it - This whole sentence needs drastic change. A doctor does not have access to the rat pup studies that GlaxoSmithKline has and kept from the public. Expectant mothers should be made aware of the Sloot study whereby Seroxat and other SSRi's were exposed to rat fetuses. Out of all the SSRi's used in this study only one came out as a clear teratogen - Seroxat. Another example of a teratogen, in case consumers are not aware of the word, is the anti-nausea and sedative drug, Thalidomide.

6. If you take this medicine during the late stages of pregnancy your baby may have some problems after birth. The sort of 'problems' are:


Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN) – 6 times increased risk
Anencephaly (fatal neural tube defect) – 2.5 times increased risk
Clubfoot – 5 times increased risk
Craniosynostosis (craniofacial defect) – 2.5 times increased risk
Omphalocele (abdominal wall defect) – nearly tripled risk
Gastroschisis (abdominal wall defect) – 30 percent increased risk
Pulmonary Atresia – 3 times increased risk
Spina Bifida – 60 percent increased risk
Diaphragmatic Hernia – 80 percent increased risk
Anal and Esophagal Atresia – 30 percent increased risk
Heart Defects – nearly doubled risk
Septal Defects, including Atrial and Ventricular (also known as “hole in the heart” defects)
Hypoplastic Left/Right Heart Syndromes
Malformed or blocked heart valves that will not close
Transposition of the Great Arteries
Tetralogy of Fallot
Mitral Valve
Heart murmur

Like packets of cigarettes I make the recommendation that GlaxoSmithKline add a photograph to the packaging of Seroxat. An example is below.


Spina Bifida – 60 percent increased risk when taking Seroxat [1]


7. This medicine may decrease fertility in men. Given recommendation 6 this may not be such a bad thing, particularly if the female partner is also digesting Seroxat. Sir Witty and his team of handpicked executives may wish to visit any male patient who has decreased fertility as a result of taking Seroxat and, if requested, help to fill out some adoption forms for the wannabe father. GlaxoSmithKline shall foot the bill for the whole adoption procedure, including lawyers fees and expenses for the child up to the age of 19.

8. Before you have your baby you should discuss breast-feeding with your doctor or midwife as Seroxat can find a way into your baby when he/she breast feeds. This can cause serious implications for the newborn child and may result in Seroxat overdose, addiction, agitation and in some instances death. They will help you decide what is best for you and your baby based on the benefits and risks associated with this medicine. They will also offer you the court transcripts from the Kilker Vs GlaxoSmithKline birth defect trial where GlaxoSmithKline were found guilty for manufacturing a drug [Seroxat] that caused Lyam Kilker to be born with heart defects. This will  help expectant mothers to make a fully informed decision and may deter them from breast feeding given that Seroxat can harm a baby whilst it is still in the womb so chances are the baby can be harmed if ingesting breast milk that is still in the mother's system. You should only breast-feed your baby while taking this medicine on the advice of your doctor or midwife and with the knowledge that your doctor or midwife actually know what they are talking about.


I make these recommendations with the knowledge that healthcare professionals and GlaxoSmithKline have the right to ignore them as do global medicine regulators and coroners. In fact, the word 'recommendation' means nothing. It just makes people like me seem as if I really care when in actual fact I'm just recommending what I think should be done but I know that the likelihood of any recommendations made simply means that nothing has to be adhered to. I'm a Judge and I have to be seen to be doing something. I use war as an example. World leaders got together to fight the might of Hitler. At some point it was only recommended that they intervene. They didn't have to but because they did they stopped Hitler, some would suggest that those recommendations to intervene should have been carried out earlier, maybe more lives would have been saved. Thing is, those recommendations were listened to, they were put into place and we are a better world for it.

I would urge for GlaxoSmithKline's CEO and handpicked executives to search their consciences but past litigation [in the US] has shown that these individuals blame everyone and everything but their product.

I would like to recommend that Seroxat is removed from the shelves but know I would face tough opposition from those who have been duped into believing that the benefits of this particular antidepressant outweigh the risks. The risks, all of them, should be printed out in clear laypersons terms, again, I can only recommend this. I do know that, after reviewing all the court documents in cases such as Seroxat induced suicide, Seroxat birth defects, Seroxat withdrawal/addiction, that I will never allow any family member of mine to take this drug. That's my privilege as I am a Judge.

Glaxo's motion to dismiss - Granted.

Rt Hon Judge I.M Pointless


**Footnote**

Later that year the Rt Hon Judge I.M Pointless granted the same motions to Eli Lilly, Wyeth, Pfizer, Forest Labs, Lundbeck and other SSRi manufacturers, including those manufacturers that make generic versions of SSRi medication. 

He also made similar recommendations.


[1] Birth Defects Cased By Seroxat [Birth Defect Resource]




Bob Fiddaman




JOIN THE FIDDAMAN BLOG ON FACEBOOK





Friday, June 29, 2012

CafePharma Boards



Was browsing through the boards over at CafePharma earlier, I enjoy reading some of the threads on the GlaxoSmithKline page where disgruntled employees, many of them reps, attack the likes of Andrew... [**coughs]...sorry, Sir Andrew Witty.

I'm sure many of the anonymous posters on these boards are legit and are genuinely miffed about the company they work for. Long hours, promises of bonuses, changes in company mantra, promoting drugs off-label to doctors whilst wining and dining them or bringing their staff in coffee from Starbucks or donuts from the company that tell you to 'dunk them'

With what seems like a bitchin' pot of messages to Glaxo it surprises me that none of the disgruntled army of ex and current employees have ever thought about blowing the whistle on those they target.

Sure, it's great to beeatch and off-load your angst against the company but does it really change anything?

Glaxo aren't the only pharmaceutical company that comes under fire, there's different boards for each of the leading pharmaceutical companies, each of which are ladened with current and ex-employees attacking the various policies and management [ahem mismanagement] of the companies they once worked/work for.

I'm writing this in the hope that someone from these boards will pick up on it. By all means carry on bitchin', it makes great reading, but do something about it. Let's face it, the companies you work/ed for don't exactly look after you as they do their key opinion leaders [thought leaders] do they?

When was the last time a rep was given a big, fat meaty cheque for promoting a drug? Okay, they get a wage and, sometimes a bonus [when it's paid on time] but nowhere near to the sums paid to thought leaders such as Karen Wagner, Josef Biederman and/or Marty "bling bling" Keller.

I'd be miffed if I were an employee or ex-employee of major pharmaceutical companies. I'd be pissed at the fact that my employee had used me to promote drugs to children when, in actual fact, my company knew all along that these drugs were not safe for children. I'd be pissed that my company had paid out millions of dollars to thought leaders yet made me work extra-long hours for a mere pittance and a performance based bonus... based on how I could promote drugs for populations that weren't meant for those populations.

I'd be so pissed off with allowing myself to be manipulated by company spin just so I couldn't see the wood through the trees, the dense forest hiding the facts that I had been used as a drug peddler, my objective being to push doctors to prescribe to the vulnerable populations out there... Children.

Hey ho, thankfully I've never been down that road. My conscience is clear.

The bitchin' on CafePharma continues, the main objective, it seems, being just a place to let off steam.

Only way these disgruntled masses can get back at those who treated them with contempt is to start blowing whistles. I'm sure there are many whom have witnessed fraudulent acts against the US government. Whether or not they have been part of these acts is irrelevant - they can and should try to bring about change.

I'm a big fan of US attorneys, Baum Hedlund. They've kicked GlaxoSmithKline's ass to infinity... and beyond on many occasions. They, I'm sure, would welcome employees or ex-employees of big pharma to bitch at them down the phone.

Whistleblower suits are becoming more popular these days, particularly against pharmaceutical companies.

Allen Jones blew the whistle on Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen unit for promoting the off-label use of Risperdal in children. J&J settled with a payment of $158 million, some of which went Jones' way for blowing the whistle. The settlement came less than a month after J&J officials agreed to pay more than $1 billion to the U.S. and a number of states to end a civil investigation into Risperdal marketing practices.

Cheryl Eckard, who humiliated GlaxoSmithKline with regard to the appalling lapses at their manufacturing plant in Cidra, Puerto Rico, was also paid handsomely for whistleblowing. A cool $96 million went her way.

Helen Ge was a former contractor at Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. She learned that Takeda have been playing down risks of three of their drugs, particularly when combined with other drugs. She was fired from her position when she brought this to the attention of her seniors. She has now filed a whistleblower suit.

The more the merrier, I say.

So, I do hope that this post makes it across cyberspace to CafePharma. I also hope that I can somehow tap into the conscience of those who throw the flames anonymously on the boards over there.

Do what's right. Blow the whistle.

Just click on the image to start the ball rolling.



Alternatively, drop me an email... cos I just love blowing the whistle.


Email me



Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK 'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman US and CANADA HERE OR UK HERE

AUSTRALIAN ORDERS HERE


Saturday, December 10, 2011

MHRA's June Raine Sticks Fingers In Her Ears




It appears that I'm not the only one with a gripe against the MHRA.

Dr June Raine, Director, Vigilance, Risk Management of Medicines, MHRA


All Party Parliamentary Group for Involuntary Tranquilliser Addiction [APPGITA] website is sharing an email sent to June Raine by John Perrott.

Perrott points out that Raine, for reasons unknown, refuses to answer his questions regarding Wyeth withholding safety data from the UK Ativan data sheet or explain why it took a further 18 years for warnings to start being listed by the MHRA.

Perrott's email asks further questions of the MHRA, questions that I doubt will ever be answered. What his email does show, however, is that once again the MHRA are under the spotlight for all the wrong reasons and when they are called to task by members of the public they either label them 'vexatious' or just simply refuse to answer questions.

There's me thinking they had a duty and moral obligation to answer queries.

John Perrott's email can be read in full HERE


RELATED: - MHRA In Buck-Passing Specialist Cahoots








Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Baby Matthew's Voice Is Finally Heard



I've highlighted the story of Matthew Schultz on my blog many times in the past. Matthew was just two hours old when he died in the arms of his parents Christiane and Amery. Christiane had been taking the powerful antidepressant Effexor during her pregnancy and shortly after giving birth to Matthew it became apparent that he had breathing problems. Two hours later he was pronounced dead, leaving both Christiane and Amery in complete shock, leaving them with many questions that hospital staff could not answer.

Upon learning of the dangers of taking SSRi/SNRi medication during pregnancy, the Schultz family started to ask questions, once again nobody could give them any definitive answer.


Matthew died Feb. 21, 2009, some two and a half years later a glimmer of progress has been made toward creating an awareness about the dangers of antidepressant use during pregnancy.

Yesterday, Kamloops This Week,[KTS] a local newspaper, broke the news that the Royal Inland Hospital, where Matthew was born, had deemed, via their perinatal review committee, that there was “value” in exploring the issues raised by the Schultz family. "The review", writes KTS, "has been forwarded to RIH’s quality committee, another group that can continue to study the issue."

Christiane and Amery have never given up in their battle, in doing so they have created an awareness for pregnant mothers and those wanting to fall pregnant. In their pain they may just have allowed another couple to experience the joy of life, an unselfish act that should be commended.

I salute you both.

Full story HERE

More about Matthew HERE

The following video was made with the permission of the Schultz family.

RIP Little Man.



Fid

ORDER THE PAPERBACK 'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman US and CANADA HERE
OR UK FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING

AUSTRALIAN ORDERS HERE




Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Two Hours With Matthew - The Story of "Effexor Baby", Matthew Schultz.







Over the years I have been writing this blog I have come across some truly heart rending stories with regard to the loss of life. I've spoken at length with parents of those who have fallen foul to the greed of pharmaceutical companies, strived to highlight the truth that the mainstream media are too afraid to publish for fear of lawsuits hanging over their heads from manufacturers of antidepressants who wish to keep the truth within the confines of their vaults. Up to now, I've never really dived into the death of newborns, those unfortunate souls who died within months, weeks, days, and in the case of Matthew Schultz, hours.


Matthew was born on February 21, 2009. His parents, Amery and Christiane, spent just two hours with him before he passed away. He weighed just 7 pounds 3 ounces. He went into cardiac arrest shortly after he was born.


Matthew died from Effexor exposure, although at the time his parents didn't know this. Why would they? Effexor carried no warning. Neither Amery or Christiane were warned about the potential dangers of taking Effexor whilst pregnant, they were told many, many times that Effexor was safe.


Matthew's mother had been taking Effexor during her pregnancy, she was prescribed it by her doctor, who had diagnosed that she was suffering with "severe chronic depression", as a matter of fact, Christiane had been taking Effexor for 8 years prior to giving birth to Matthew.


"Christiane was never really truly depressed", recalls husband Amery, "Effexor never really changed her moods at all. However, once Christiane was on Effexor she found it almost impossible to get off." Amery added, ".. they turned her into an emotional zombie. Although she still had depressive symptoms, she never truly had happy moments."


During her 8 years on Effexor, Christiane had given birth to three other children, two of them were born with heart murmers whilst the third was born extremely under-weight at full term and also had a lung disorder. At no point did doctors associate Effexor being the causation of the three children being born with defects.


During her pregnancy with Matthew, Christiane asked the OBGYN, the physician who specializes in medical and surgical care to women with expertise in pregnancy, childbirth, if it was safe to take Effexor whilst pregnant. The reply, recalls Amery, was, "Women take this stuff all the time, we don't see any problem with it."


Christiane recounts on an early blog post of hers that both her and husband, Amery, had done a lot of research since their son had died. She writes:


Since Matthew died, we have done a lot of research. Turns out that my antidepressants have serious side effects. Not only to me, but my children through me. That would explain why out of 5 pregnancies, I have had something wrong with all of them. And why each subsequent pregnancies were more and more difficult.


Furthermore, both Christiane and Amery supplied their doctor with large amounts of evidence regarding Effexor and infant death they had obtained off the internet. Their doctor was astonished.


Too little, too late for Amery and Christiane.


The Canadian drug regulator, Health Canada, have, in the past, issued warnings to doctors regarding taking SSRi/SNRi medication whilst pregnant. This, however, is just not implemented, in fact, doctor's don't even have to read any warnings they get from Health Canada.


On June 28, 2004 some 5 years before Matthew was born, the FDA and Wyeth [Effexor's then manufacturer] issued a new MedWatch drug Alert to healthcare professionals: [1]


"Neonates exposed to Effexor, other SNRIs (Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors), or SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors), late in the third trimester of pregnancy have developed complications requiring prolonged hospitalization, respiratory support, and tube feeding."


This information was sent out to the medical profession in America. Two years later, in 2006, Health Canada issued a warning to all pregnant women considering becoming pregnant that SSRI drugs similar to Effexor may pose life-threatening risks to their babies. Nursing mothers were also warned that SSRIs could be secreted in milk and could have an effect on nursing infants. [2]


So, why, if this information was out there, did Christiane continue taking Effexor?


It's simple really, the public are rarely told by the medical profession about such warnings because the doctor's, nurses, OBGYN's, psychiatrists, rarely read the warnings. Like the UK, there is no system in place to make the medical profession read the warnings. The regulator has a clear conscience because they can profess that they did everything to warn about the dangers.


We know that's bullshit, right?


If the CEO of Health Canada saw his daughter climbing into a rubber dinghy and he knew that rubber dinghy had two holes in it, do you honestly think he would send her a letter of warning?


Of course not, it's absurd.


With millions of dollars spent on the promotion of these drugs, is it too much to ask Health Canada, or any other regulator for that matter, that when a warning as severe as death occurs, they shout it from the rooftops rather than send a letter that may never be opened by the recipient?


It's common sense really...then again, if Health Canada are anything like the British drug regulator, the MHRA, common sense won't be in their dictionary.


Amery and Christiane have been at loggerheads with their coroner regarding Matthew's death. In February, 2011, Amery received the final coroner's report. It was delivered to him on the 21st February, Matthew's 2nd birthday and 2nd anniversary of his death.


Fantastic timing huh?


What is utterly perverse about the coroner's report is that Coroner Robert Saunders, Province of British Columbia, stated that there was no anatomical or toxicological cause of death. Yet under the heading, "Other Significant Conditions Contributing to Death", Exposure to venlafaxine in utero is listed? Furthermore, the coroner adds that this is "Natural" [See pic below]


Click to enlarge




In essence, Saunders is stating that it is natural for anyone to die after being exposed to Effexor in utero.


Amery, obviously, was incensed, who wouldn't be? This prompted him to write a blog entitled, "How far could your head be up your ass?" He opens with the paragraph;


This past week I recieved what is supposed to be the final report from the Coroner on Matthew’s brief life and death. As I allude to in the title of this posting, the presiding coroners have their heads firmly implanted in their collective asses. I have taken the liberty of uploading the three pages of the report here. The irony of this report being issued on Matthew’s second birthday was not lost on us.


One has to question the insensitivity of the coroner here. He can't claim to not know the date of Matthew's death as it is plastered all over the report, so why send it out to parents on what would have been such a sombre date for them?


The Coroners Service of British Columbia is responsible for the investigation of all unnatural, sudden and unexpected, unexplained or unattended deaths. It makes recommendations to improve public safety and prevent death in similar circumstances.[3]


I've said in previous articles I have wrote that coroner's deal with death on a daily basis, seeing a dead body is like eating a bowl of cornflakes, it's such a regular occurrence but for crying out loud, show some tact when sending out reports to grieving parents!


Amery and I have corresponded over the years. I feel for him and I also greatly admire him. Yet again, life has been snatched away from loving parents, a life that was not given a chance because a greedy pharmaceutical company and an inept medicines regulator failed in their duty to give Matthew Schultz a chance of life. It's a despicable act and one that should never be forgotten.


Fid


[1] http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/04/06/29.php
[2] http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/case/effexor-heart-birth-defects.html
[3] http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/coroners/


Further reading


http://twohours.wordpress.com/


Matthew's Facebook page


**The following video contains images that some viewers may find deeply upsetting. It is with the wishes of both parents that these pictures be shown to highlight the dangers of taking SSRi/SNRi medication whilst pregnant.




ORDER THE PAPERBACK
'THE EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, IS CLEAR...THE SEROXAT SCANDAL' By Bob Fiddaman
SIGNED COPIES HERE OR UNSIGNED FROM CHIPMUNKA PUBLISHING

Please contact me if you would like a guest post considered for publication on my blog.